General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 03-71823 Filed: 4/30/03 Nsuit: 0 Gherebi, et al v. USDC-CAC Appeal from: Central District of California, Los Angeles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Case type information: 1) original proceeding 2) mandamus 3) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lower court information: District: 0973-2 : CV-03-01267-AHM presiding judge: A. Howard Matz, District Judge Date Filed: **/**/** Date order/judgment: **/**/** Date NOA filed: **/**/** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fee status: due - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prior cases: 03-80012 EL FFF MSB Date filed: 2/5/03 Date disposed: 2/18/03 Disposition: trf/jdg Current cases: None Docket as of July 25, 2003 11:23 pm Page 1 03-71823 Gherebi, et al v. USDC-CAC BELAID GHEREBI, as next friend Stephen Yagman, Esq. of SALIM GHEREBI 310-452-3200 Petitioner [COR LD NTC ret] YAGMAN & YAGMAN & REICHMANN & BLOOMFIELD 723 Ocean Front Walk Venice, CA 90291-3270 v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT no appearance FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF [NTC] CALIFORNIA Respondent GEORGE WALKER BUSH no appearance Real Party in Interest (See above) [NTC] DONALD H. RUMSFELD, and 1,000 no appearance Unknown named United State (See above) Military personnel and [NTC] Government Officers and/or Officials Real Party in Interest Docket as of July 25, 2003 11:23 pm Page 2 03-71823 Gherebi, et al v. USDC-CAC BELAID GHEREBI, as next friend of SALIM GHEREBI Petitioner v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA; Respondent GEORGE WALKER BUSH; DONALD H. RUMSFELD, and 1,000 Unknown named United State Military personnel and Government Officers and/or Officials Real Parties in Interest Docket as of July 25, 2003 11:23 pm Page 3 03-71823 Gherebi, et al v. USDC-CAC 4/25/03 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MAND, DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. (MOATT) [03-71823] (tm) 7/25/03 Order filed: The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained in this closed docket. DENIED ( Terminated on the Merits after Submission Without Oral Hearing; Denied; Written, Unsigned, Unpublished. Edward LEAVY, Michael D. HAWKINS, Johnnie B. RAWLINSON ) [03-71823] (tm) Docket as of July 25, 2003 11:23 pm Page 4