The report was prepared by Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba on alleged
abuse of prisoners by members of the 800th Military Police
Brigade at the Abu Ghraib Prison in Baghdad.
It was ordered by Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez,
commander of Joint Task Force-7, the senior U.S. military official in
Iraq, following persistent allegations of human rights abuses at the
prison.
Editor’s note: The report includes graphic
descriptions of events some readers may find objectionable.
ARTICLE 15-6 INVESTIGATION OF
THE 800th MILITARY POLICE BRIGADE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
References ………………………………………………………… 3
Background ……………………………………………………… 6
Assessment of DoD Counter-Terrorism Interrogation
and Detention Operations In Iraq
(MG Miller’s Assessment).……….…………........... 8
IO Comments on MG Miller’s Assessment..………
8
Report on Detention and Corrections In Iraq
(MG Ryder’s Report).................................... 9
IO Comments on MG Ryder’s Report…...………… 12
Preliminary Investigative Actions ……………….. 12
Findings and Recommendations
Part One (Detainee Abuse). ………………………… 15
Findings …………………………………………. 15
Recommendations …………………………… 20
Part Two (Escapes and Accountability) …….. 22
Findings …………………………………………. 22
Recommendations. ………………………… 31
Part Three (Command Climate, Etc…). ………
34
Findings ……………………………………… …
36
Recommendations …… ……………………
44
Other Findings/Observations ………………………
49
Conclusion ………………………………………… ………… 50
Annexes ………………………………………………………… 51
References
Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of
Prisoners of War, 12 August 1949Geneva Convention for the Amelioration
of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in the Armed Forces in the
Field, 12 August 1949
3. Geneva Convention for the Amelioration
of the Condition of the Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed
Forces at Sea, 12 August 1949
4. Geneva Convention Protocol Relative to
the Status of Refugees, 1967
5. Geneva Convention Relative to the Status
of Refugees, 1951
6. Geneva Convention for the Protection
of War Victims, 12 August 1949
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection
of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 12 August 1949DOD Directive 5100.69,
“DOD Program for Prisoners of War and other Detainees,” 27 December
1972DOD Directive 5100.77 “DOD Law of War Program,” 10 July 1979STANAG
No. 2044, Procedures for Dealing with Prisoners of War (PW) (Edition
5), 28 June 1994STANAG No. 2033, Interrogation of Prisoners of War (PW)
(Edition 6), 6 December 1994AR 190-8, Enemy Prisoners of War, Retained
Personnel, Civilian Internees, and Other Detainees, 1 October 1997AR
190-47, The Army Corrections System, 15 August 1996
14. AR 190-14, Carrying of Firearms and Use
of Force for Law Enforcement and Security Duties, 12 March 1993
15. AR 195-5, Evidence Procedures, 28 August
1992
16. AR 190-11, Physical Security of Arms, Ammunition
and Explosives, 12 February 1998
17. AR 190-12, Military Police Working Dogs,
30 September 1993
18. AR 190-13, The Army Physical Security Program,
30 September 1993
19. AR 380-67, Personnel Security Program, 9
September 1988
20. AR 380-5, Department of the Army Information
Security, 31 September 2000
21. AR 670-1, Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms
and Insignia, 5 September 2003
22. AR 190-40, Serious Incident Report, 30 November
1993
23. AR 15-6, Procedures for Investigating Officers
and Boards of Officers, 11 May 1988
24. AR 27-10, Military Justice, 6 September
2002
25. AR 635-200, Enlisted Personnel, 1 November
2000
26. AR 600-8-24, Officer Transfers and Discharges,
29 June 2002
27. AR 500-5, Army Mobilization, 6 July 1996
28. AR 600-20, Army Command Policy, 13 May 2002
29. AR 623-105, Officer Evaluation Reports,
1 April 1998
30. AR 175-9, Contractors Accompanying the Force,
29 October 1999
FM 3-19.40, Military Police Internment/Resettlement
Operations, 1 August 2001FM 3-19.1, Military Police Operations, 22 March
2001FM 3-19.4, Military Police Leaders' Handbook, 4 March 2002 FM 3-05.30,
Psychological Operations, 19 June 2000FM 33-1-1, Psychological Operations
Techniques and Procedures, 5 May 1994FM 34-52, Intelligence Interrogation,
28 September 1992FM 19-15, Civil Disturbances, 25 November 198538.
FM 3-0, Operations, 14 June 2001
39. FM 101-5, Staff Organizations and Functions,
23 May 1984
40. FM 3-19.30, Physical Security, 8 January
2001
41. FM 3-21.5, Drill and Ceremonies, 7 July
2003
42. ARTEP 19-546-30 MTP, Mission Training Plan
for Military Police Battalion (IR)
43. ARTEP 19-667-30 MTP, Mission Training Plan
for Military Police Guard Company
44. ARTEP 19-647-30 MTP, Mission Training Plan
for Military Police Escort Guard Company
45. STP 19-95B1-SM, Soldier’s Manual, MOS 95B,
Military Police, Skill Level 1, 6 August 2002
46. STP 19-95C14-SM-TG, Soldier’s Manual and
Trainer’s Guide for MOS 95C Internment/Resettlement Specialist, Skill
Levels 1/2/3/4, 26 March 1999
47. STP 19-95C1-SM MOS 95C, Corrections Specialist,
Skill Level 1, Soldier's Manual, 30 September 2003
48. STP 19-95C24-SM-TG MOS 95C, Corrections
Specialist, Skill Levels 2/3/4, Soldier's Manual and Trainer's Guide,
30 September 2003
49. Assessment of DOD Counter-Terrorism Interrogation
and Detention Operations in Iraq, (MG Geoffrey D. Miller, Commander
JTF-GTMO, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba), 9 September 2003
50. Assessment of Detention and Corrections
Operations in Iraq, (MG Donald J. Ryder, Provost Marshal General), 6
November 2003
51. CJTF-7 FRAGO #1108, Subject: includes-
para 3.C.8 & 3.C.8.A.1, Assignment of 205 MI BDE CDR Responsibilities
for the Baghdad Central Confinement Facility (BCCF), 19 November 2003
52. CJTF-7 FRAGO #749, Subject: Intelligence
and Evidence-Led Detention Operations Relating to Detainees, 24 August
2003
53. 800th MP BDE FRAGO # 89, Subject: Rules
of Engagement, 26 December 2003
54. CG CJTF-7 Memo: CJTF-7 Interrogation and
Counter-Resistance Policy, 12 October 2003
55. CG CJTF-7 Memo: Dignity and Respect While
Conducting Operations, 13 December 2003
56. Uniform Code of Military Justice and Manual
for Courts Martial, 2002 Edition
ARTICLE 15-6 INVESTIGATION OF THE800th
MILITARY POLICE BRIGADE
BACKGROUND
1. (U) On 19 January 2004, Lieutenant General
(LTG) Ricardo S. Sanchez, Commander, Combined Joint Task Force Seven
(CJTF-7) requested that the Commander, US Central Command, appoint an
Investigating Officer (IO) in the grade of Major General (MG) or above
to investigate the conduct of operations within the 800th Military Police
(MP) Brigade. LTG Sanchez requested an investigation of detention and
internment operations by the Brigade from 1 November 2003 to present.
LTG Sanchez cited recent reports of detainee abuse, escapes from confinement
facilities, and accountability lapses, which indicated systemic problems
within the brigade and suggested a lack of clear standards, proficiency,
and leadership. LTG Sanchez requested a comprehensive and all-encompassing
inquiry to make findings and recommendations concerning the fitness
and performance of the 800th MP Brigade. (ANNEX 2)
2. (U) On 24 January 2003, the Chief of Staff
of US Central Command (CENTCOM), MG R. Steven Whitcomb, on behalf of
the CENTCOM Commander, directed that the Commander, Coalition Forces
Land Component Command (CFLCC), LTG David D. McKiernan, conduct an investigation
into the 800th MP Brigade’s detention and internment operations from
1 November 2003 to present. CENTCOM directed that the investigation
should inquire into all facts and circumstances surrounding recent reports
of suspected detainee abuse in Iraq. It also directed that the investigation
inquire into detainee escapes and accountability lapses as reported
by CJTF-7, and to gain a more comprehensive and all-encompassing inquiry
into the fitness and performance of the 800th MP Brigade. (ANNEX
3)
3. (U) On 31 January 2004, the Commander, CFLCC,
appointed MG Antonio M. Taguba, Deputy Commanding General Support, CFLCC,
to conduct this investigation. MG Taguba was directed to conduct an
informal investigation under AR 15-6 into the 800th MP Brigade’s detention
and internment operations. Specifically, MG Taguba was tasked to:
a. (U) Inquire into all the facts and circumstances
surrounding recent allegations of detainee abuse, specifically allegations
of maltreatment at the Abu Ghraib Prison (Baghdad Central Confinement
Facility (BCCF));
b. (U) Inquire into detainee escapes and accountability
lapses as reported by CJTF-7, specifically allegations concerning these
events at the Abu Ghraib Prison;
c. (U) Investigate the training, standards,
employment, command policies, internal procedures, and command climate
in the 800th MP Brigade, as appropriate;
d. (U) Make specific findings of fact concerning
all aspects of the investigation, and make any recommendations for corrective
action, as appropriate. (ANNEX 4)
4. (U) LTG Sanchez’s request to investigate
the 800th MP Brigade followed the initiation of a criminal investigation
by the US Army Criminal Investigation Command (USACIDC) into specific
allegations of detainee abuse committed by members of the 372nd MP Company,
320th MP Battalion in Iraq. These units are part of the 800th MP Brigade.
The Brigade is an Iraq Theater asset, TACON to CJTF-7, but OPCON to
CFLCC at the time this investigation was initiated. In addition, CJTF-7
had several reports of detainee escapes from US/Coalition Confinement
Facilities in Iraq over the past several months. These include Camp
Bucca, Camp Ashraf, Abu Ghraib, and the High Value Detainee (HVD) Complex/Camp
Cropper. The 800th MP Brigade operated these facilities. In addition,
four Soldiers from the 320th MP Battalion had been formally charged
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with detainee abuse
in May 2003 at the Theater Internment Facility (TIF) at Camp Bucca,
Iraq. (ANNEXES 5-18, 34 and 35)
5. (U) I began assembling my investigation team
prior to the actual appointment by the CFLCC Commander. I assembled
subject matter experts from the CFLCC Provost Marshal (PM) and the CFLCC
Staff Judge Advocate (SJA). I selected COL Kinard J. La Fate, CFLCC
Provost Marshal to be my Deputy for this investigation. I also contacted
the Provost Marshal General of the Army, MG Donald J. Ryder, to enlist
the support of MP subject matter experts in the areas of detention and
internment operations. (ANNEXES 4 and 19)
6. (U) The Investigating Team also reviewed
the Assessment of DoD Counter-Terrorism Interrogation and Detention
Operations in Iraq conducted by MG Geoffrey D. Miller, Commander, Joint
Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO). From 31 August to 9 September 2003,
MG Miller led a team of personnel experienced in strategic interrogation
to HQ, CJTF-7 and the Iraqi Survey Group (ISG) to review current Iraqi
Theater ability to rapidly exploit internees for actionable intelligence.
MG Miller’s team focused on three areas: intelligence integration,
synchronization, and fusion; interrogation operations; and detention
operations. MG Miller’s team used JTF-GTMO procedures and interrogation
authorities as baselines. (ANNEX 20)
7. (U) The Investigating Team began its inquiry
with an in-depth analysis of the Report on Detention and Corrections
in Iraq, dated 5 November 2003, conducted by MG Ryder and a team of
military police, legal, medical, and automation experts. The CJTF-7
Commander, LTG Sanchez, had previously requested a team of subject matter
experts to assess, and make specific recommendations concerning detention
and corrections operations. From 13 October to 6 November 2003, MG
Ryder personally led this assessment/assistance team in Iraq. (ANNEX
19)
ASSESSMENT OF DoD COUNTER-TERRORISM
INTERROGATION AND DETENTION OPERATIONS IN IRAQ (MG MILLER’S ASSESSMENT)
1. (S/NF) The principal focus of MG Miller’s
team was on the strategic interrogation of detainees/internees in Iraq.
Among its conclusions in its Executive Summary were that CJTF-7 did
not have authorities and procedures in place to affect a unified strategy
to detain, interrogate, and report information from detainees/internees
in Iraq. The Executive Summary also stated that detention operations
must act as an enabler for interrogation. (ANNEX 20)
2. (S/NF) With respect to interrogation, MG
Miller’s Team recommended that CJTF-7 dedicate and train a detention
guard force subordinate to the Joint Interrogation Debriefing Center
(JIDC) Commander that “sets the conditions for the successful interrogation
and exploitation of internees/detainees.” Regarding Detention Operations,
MG Miller’s team stated that the function of Detention Operations is
to provide a safe, secure, and humane environment that supports the
expeditious collection of intelligence. However, it also stated “it
is essential that the guard force be actively engaged in setting the
conditions for successful exploitation of the internees.” (ANNEX
20)
3. (S/NF) MG Miller’s
team also concluded that Joint Strategic Interrogation Operations (within
CJTF-7) are hampered by lack of active control of the internees within
the detention environment. The Miller Team also stated that establishment
of the Theater Joint Interrogation and Detention Center (JIDC) at Abu
Ghraib (BCCF) will consolidate both detention and strategic interrogation
operations and result in synergy between MP and MI resources and an
integrated, synchronized, and focused strategic interrogation effort.
(ANNEX 20)
4. (S/NF) MG Miller’s team also observed that
the application of emerging strategic interrogation strategies and techniques
contain new approaches and operational art. The Miller Team also concluded
that a legal review and recommendations on internee interrogation operations
by a dedicated Command Judge Advocate is required to maximize interrogation
effectiveness. (ANNEX 20)
IO COMMENTS ON MG MILLER’S ASSESSMENT
1. (S/NF) MG Miller’s
team recognized that they were using JTF-GTMO operational procedures
and interrogation authorities as baselines for its observations and
recommendations. There is a strong argument that the intelligence value
of detainees held at JTF-Guantanamo (GTMO) is different than that of
the detainees/internees held at Abu Ghraib (BCCF) and other detention
facilities in Iraq. Currently, there are a large number of Iraqi criminals
held at Abu Ghraib (BCCF). These are not believed to be international
terrorists or members of Al Qaida, Anser Al Islam, Taliban, and other
international terrorist organizations. (ANNEX 20)
2. (S/NF) The recommendations of MG Miller’s
team that the “guard force” be actively engaged in setting the conditions
for successful exploitation of the internees would appear to be in conflict
with the recommendations of MG Ryder’s Team and AR 190-8 that military
police “do not participate in military intelligence supervised interrogation
sessions.” The Ryder Report concluded that the OEF template whereby
military police actively set the favorable conditions for subsequent
interviews runs counter to the smooth operation of a detention facility.
(ANNEX 20)
REPORT ON DETENTION AND CORRECTIONS
IN IRAQ (MG RYDER’S REPORT)
1. (U) MG Ryder and his assessment team conducted
a comprehensive review of the entire detainee and corrections system
in Iraq and provided recommendations addressing each of the following
areas as requested by the Commander CJTF-7:
a. (U) Detainee and corrections system management
b. (U) Detainee management, including detainee
movement, segregation, and accountability
c. (U) Means of command and control of the
detention and corrections system
d. (U) Integration of military detention and
corrections with the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) and adequacy
of plans for transition to an Iraqi-run corrections system
e. (U) Detainee medical care and health management
f. (U) Detention facilities that meet required
health, hygiene, and sanitation standards
g. (U) Court integration and docket management
for criminal detainees
h. (U) Detainee legal processing
i. (U) Detainee databases and records, including
integration with law enforcement and court databases (ANNEX
19)
2. (U) Many of the findings and recommendations
of MG Ryder’s team are beyond the scope of this investigation. However,
several important findings are clearly relevant to this inquiry and
are summarized below (emphasis is added in certain areas):
A. (U) Detainee Management (including
movement, segregation, and accountability)
1. (U) There is a wide variance in standards
and approaches at the various detention facilities. Several Division/Brigade
collection points and US monitored Iraqi prisons had flawed or insufficiently
detailed use of force and other standing operating procedures or policies
(e.g. weapons in the facility, improper restraint techniques, detainee
management, etc.) Though, there were no military police units purposely
applying inappropriate confinement practices. (ANNEX
19)
2. (U) Currently, due to lack of adequate Iraqi
facilities, Iraqi criminals (generally Iraqi-on-Iraqi crimes) are detained
with security internees (generally Iraqi-on-Coalition offenses) and
EPWs in the same facilities, though segregated in different cells/compounds.
(ANNEX 19)
3. (U) The management of multiple disparate
groups of detained people in a single location by members of the same
unit invites confusion about handling, processing, and treatment, and
typically facilitates the transfer of information between different
categories of detainees. (ANNEX 19)
4. (U) The 800th MP (I/R) units did not receive
Internment/Resettlement (I/R) and corrections specific training during
their mobilization period. Corrections training is only on the METL
of two MP (I/R) Confinement Battalions throughout the Army, one currently
serving in Afghanistan, and elements of the other are at Camp Arifjan,
Kuwait. MP units supporting JTF-GTMO received ten days of training
in detention facility operations, to include two days of unarmed self-defense,
training in interpersonal communication skills, forced cell moves, and
correctional officer safety. (ANNEX 19)
B. (U) Means of Command and Control
of the Detention and Corrections System
1. (U) The 800th MP Brigade was originally task
organized with eight MP(I/R) Battalions consisting of both MP Guard
and Combat Support companies. Due to force rotation plans, the 800th
redeployed two Battalion HHCs in December 2003, the 115th MP Battalion
and the 324th MP Battalion. In December 2003, the 400th MP Battalion
was relieved of its mission and redeployed in January 2004. The 724thMP
Battalion redeployed on 11 February 2004 and the remainder is scheduled
to redeploy in March and April 2004. They are the 310th MP Battalion,
320th MP Battalion, 530th MP Battalion, and 744th MP Battalion. The
units that remain are generally understrength, as Reserve Component
units do not have an individual personnel replacement system to mitigate
medical losses or the departure of individual Soldiers that have reached
24 months of Federal active duty in a five-year period. (ANNEX
19)
2. (U) The 800thMP Brigade (I/R)
is currently a CFLCC asset, TACON to CJTF-7 to conduct Internment/Resettlement
(I/R) operations in Iraq. All detention operations are conducted in
the CJTF-7 AO; Camps Ganci, Vigilant, Bucca, TSP Whitford, and a separate
High Value Detention (HVD) site. (ANNEX 19)
3. (U) The 800th MP Brigade has experienced
challenges adapting its task organizational structure, training, and
equipment resources from a unit designed to conduct standard EPW operations
in the COMMZ (Kuwait). Further, the doctrinally trained MP Soldier-to-detainee
population ratio and facility layout templates are predicated on a compliant,
self-disciplining EPW population, and not criminals or high-risk security
internees. (ANNEX 19)
4. (U) EPWs and Civilian Internees should receive
the full protections of the Geneva Conventions, unless the denial of
these protections is due to specifically articulated military necessity
(e.g., no visitation to preclude the direction of insurgency operations).
(ANNEXES 19 and 24)
5. (U) AR 190-8, Enemy Prisoners of War,
Retained Personnel, Civilian Internees, and other Detainees, FM
3-19.40, Military Police Internment and Resettlement Operations,
and FM 34-52, Intelligence Interrogations, require military
police to provide an area for intelligence collection efforts within
EPW facilities. Military Police, though adept at passive collection
of intelligence within a facility, do not participate in Military Intelligence
supervised interrogation sessions. Recent intelligence collection in
support of Operation Enduring Freedom posited a template whereby military
police actively set favorable conditions for subsequent interviews.
Such actions generally run counter to the smooth operation of a detention
facility, attempting to maintain its population in a compliant and docile
state. The 800th MP Brigade has not been directed to
change its facility procedures to set the conditions for MI interrogations,
nor participate in those interrogations. (ANNEXES 19 and 21-23)
6. MG Ryder’s Report also made the following,
inter alia, near-term and mid-term recommendations regarding the command
and control of detainees:
a. (U) Align the release process for security
internees with DoD Policy. The process of screening security internees
should include intelligence findings, interrogation results, and current
threat assessment.
b. (U) Determine the scope of intelligence
collection that will occur at Camp Vigilant. Refurbish the Northeast
Compound to separate the screening operation from the Iraqi run Baghdad
Central Correctional Facility. Establish procedures that
define the role of military police Soldiers securing the compound, clearly
separating the actions of the guards from those of the military intelligence
personnel.
c. (U) Consolidate
all Security Internee Operations, except the MEK security mission, under
a single Military Police Brigade Headquarters for OIF 2.
d. (U) Insist that all units identified
to rotate into the Iraqi Theater of Operations (ITO) to conduct internment
and confinement operations in support of OIF 2 be organic to CJTF-7.
(ANNEX 19)
IO COMMENTS REGARDING MG RYDER’S REPORT
1. (U) The objective of MG Ryder’s Team was
to observe detention and prison operations, identify potential systemic
and human rights issues, and provide near-term, mid-term, and long-term
recommendations to improve CJTF-7 operations and transition of the Iraqi
prison system from US military control/oversight to the Coalition Provisional
Authority and eventually to the Iraqi Government. The Findings and
Recommendations of MG Ryder’s Team are thorough and precise and should
be implemented immediately. (ANNEX 19)
2. (U) Unfortunately, many of the
systemic problems that surfaced during MG Ryder’s Team’s assessment
are the very same issues that are the subject of this investigation.
In fact, many of the abuses suffered by detainees occurred during, or
near to, the time of that assessment. As will be pointed
out in detail in subsequent portions of this report, I disagree with
the conclusion of MG Ryder’s Team in one critical aspect, that being
its conclusion that the 800th MP Brigade had not been asked to change
its facility procedures to set the conditions for MI interviews. While
clearly the 800th MP Brigade and its commanders were not tasked to set
conditions for detainees for subsequent MI interrogations, it is obvious
from a review of comprehensive CID interviews of suspects and witnesses
that this was done at lower levels. (ANNEX 19)
3. (U) I concur fully with MG Ryder’s conclusion
regarding the effect of AR 190-8. Military Police, though adept at
passive collection of intelligence within a facility, should not participate
in Military Intelligence supervised interrogation sessions. Moreover,
Military Police should not be involved with setting “favorable
conditions” for subsequent interviews. These actions,
as will be outlined in this investigation, clearly run counter to the
smooth operation of a detention facility. (ANNEX 19)
PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS
1. (U) Following our review of MG Ryder’s Report
and MG Miller’s Report, my investigation team immediately began an in-depth
review of all available documents regarding the 800th MP Brigade. We
reviewed in detail the voluminous CID investigation regarding alleged
detainee abuses at detention facilities in Iraq, particularly the Abu
Ghraib (BCCF) Detention Facility. We analyzed approximately fifty witness
statements from military police and military intelligence personnel,
potential suspects, and detainees. We reviewed numerous photos and
videos of actual detainee abuse taken by detention facility personnel,
which are now in the custody and control of the US Army Criminal Investigation
Command and the CJTF-7 prosecution team. The photos and videos are
not contained in this investigation. We obtained copies of the 800th
MP Brigade roster, rating chain, and assorted internal investigations
and disciplinary actions involving that command for the past several
months. (All ANNEXES Reviewed by Investigation Team)
2. (U) In addition to military police and legal
officers from the CFLCC PMO and SJA Offices we also obtained the services
of two individuals who are experts in military police detention practices
and training. These were LTC Timothy Weathersbee, Commander, 705th
MP Battalion, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth,
and SFC Edward Baldwin, Senior Corrections Advisor, US Army Military
Police School, Fort Leonard Wood. I also requested and received the
services of Col (Dr) Henry Nelson, a trained US Air Force psychiatrist
assigned to assist my investigation team. (ANNEX 4)
3. (U) In addition to MG Ryder’s and MG Miller’s
Reports, the team reviewed numerous reference materials including the
12 October 2003 CJTF-7 Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy,
the AR 15-6 Investigation on Riot and Shootings at Abu Ghraib on 24
November 2003, the 205thMI Brigade’s Interrogation Rules
of Engagement (IROE), facility staff logs/journals and numerous records
of AR 15-6 investigations and Serious Incident Reports (SIRs) on detainee
escapes/shootings and disciplinary matters from the 800th MP Brigade.
(ANNEXES 5-20, 37, 93, and 94)
4. (U) On 2 February
2004, I took my team to Baghdad for a one-day inspection of the Abu
Ghraib Prison (BCCF) and the High Value Detainee (HVD) Complex in order
to become familiar with those facilities. We also met with COL Jerry
Mocello, Commander, 3rd MP Criminal Investigation Group (CID), COL Dave
Quantock, Commander, 16th MP Brigade, COL Dave Phillips, Commander,
89th MP Brigade, and COL Ed Sannwaldt, CJTF-7 Provost Marshal. On 7
February 2004, the team visited the Camp Bucca Detention Facility to
familiarize itself with the facility and operating structure. In addition,
on 6 and 7 February 2004, at Camp Doha, Kuwait, we conducted extensive
training sessions on approved detention practices. We continued our
preparation by reviewing the ongoing CID investigation and were briefed
by the Special Agent in Charge, CW2 Paul Arthur. We refreshed ourselves
on the applicable reference materials within each team member’s area
of expertise, and practiced investigative techniques. I met with the
team on numerous occasions to finalize appropriate witness lists, review
existing witness statements, arrange logistics, and collect potential
evidence. We also coordinated with CJTF-7 to arrange witness attendance,
force protection measures, and general logistics for the team’s move
to Baghdad on 8 February 2004. (ANNEXES 4 and 25)
5. (U) At the same time, due to the Transfer
of Authority on 1 February 2004 between III Corps and V Corps, and the
upcoming demobilization of the 800th MP Brigade Command, I directed
that several critical witnesses who were preparing to leave the theater
remain at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait until they could be interviewed (ANNEX
29). My team deployed to Baghdad on 8 February 2004 and
conducted a series of interviews with a variety of witnesses (ANNEX
30). We returned to Camp Doha, Kuwait on 13 February 2004.
On 14 and 15 February we interviewed a number of witnesses from the
800th MP Brigade. On 17 February we returned to Camp Bucca, Iraq to
complete interviews of witnesses at that location. From 18 February
thru 28 February we collected documents, compiled references, did follow-up
interviews, and completed a detailed analysis of the volumes of materials
accumulated throughout our investigation. On 29 February we finalized
our executive summary and out-briefing slides. On 9 March we submitted
the AR 15-6 written report with findings and recommendations to the
CFLCC Deputy SJA, LTC Mark Johnson, for a legal sufficiency review.
The out-brief to the appointing authority, LTG McKiernan, took place
on 3 March 2004. (ANNEXES 26 and 45-91)
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(PART ONE)
(U) The investigation should inquire
into all of the facts and circumstances surrounding recent allegations
of detainee abuse, specifically, allegations of maltreatment at the
Abu Ghraib Prison (Baghdad Central Confinement Facility).
1. (U) The US Army Criminal Investigation Command
(CID), led by COL Jerry Mocello, and a team of highly trained professional
agents have done a superb job of investigating several complex and extremely
disturbing incidents of detainee abuse at the Abu Ghraib Prison. They
conducted over 50 interviews of witnesses, potential criminal suspects,
and detainees. They also uncovered numerous photos and videos portraying
in graphic detail detainee abuse by Military Police personnel on numerous
occasions from October to December 2003. Several potential suspects
rendered full and complete confessions regarding their personal involvement
and the involvement of fellow Soldiers in this abuse. Several potential
suspects invoked their rights under Article 31 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice (UCMJ) and the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
(ANNEX 25)
2. (U) In addition to a comprehensive and exhaustive
review of all of these statements and documentary evidence, we also
interviewed numerous officers, NCOs, and junior enlisted Soldiers in
the 800th MP Brigade, as well as members of the 205th Military Intelligence
Brigade working at the prison. We did not believe it was necessary
to re-interview all the numerous witnesses who had previously provided
comprehensive statements to CID, and I have adopted those statements
for the purposes of this investigation. (ANNEXES 26, 34,
35, and 45-91)
REGARDING PART ONE OF THE INVESTIGATION,
I MAKE THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. (U) That Forward Operating Base (FOB) Abu
Ghraib (BCCF) provides security of both criminal and security detainees
at the Baghdad Central Correctional Facility, facilitates the conducting
of interrogations for CJTF-7, supports other CPA operations at the prison,
and enhances the force protection/quality of life of Soldiers assigned
in order to ensure the success of ongoing operations to secure a free
Iraq. (ANNEX 31)
2. (U) That the Commander, 205th Military Intelligence
Brigade, was designated by CJTF-7 as the Commander of FOB Abu Ghraib
(BCCF) effective 19 November 2003. That the 205th MI Brigade conducts
operational and strategic interrogations for CJTF-7. That from 19
November 2003 until Transfer of Authority (TOA) on 6 February 2004,
COL Thomas M. Pappas was the Commander of the 205th MI Brigade and the
Commander of FOB Abu Ghraib (BCCF). (ANNEX 31)
3. (U) That the 320th Military Police Battalion
of the 800th MP Brigade is responsible for the Guard Force at Camp Ganci,
Camp Vigilant, & Cellblock 1 of FOB Abu Ghraib (BCCF). That from
February 2003 to until he was suspended from his duties on 17 January
2004, LTC Jerry Phillabaum served as the Battalion Commander of the
320th MP Battalion. That from December 2002 until he was suspended
from his duties, on 17 January 2004, CPT Donald Reese served as the
Company Commander of the 372ndMP Company, which was in charge
of guarding detainees at FOB Abu Ghraib. I further find that both the
320th MP Battalion and the 372ndMP Company were located within
the confines of FOB Abu Ghraib. (ANNEXES 32 and 45)
4. (U) That from July of 2003 to the present,
BG Janis L. Karpinski was the Commander of the 800th MP Brigade. (ANNEX
45)
5. (S) That between October and December 2003,
at the Abu Ghraib Confinement Facility (BCCF), numerous incidents of
sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses were inflicted on several
detainees. This systemic and illegal abuse of detainees was intentionally
perpetrated by several members of the military police guard force (372nd
Military Police Company, 320thMilitary Police Battalion,
800th MP Brigade), in Tier (section) 1-A of the Abu Ghraib Prison (BCCF).
The allegations of abuse were substantiated by detailed witness statements
(ANNEX 26) and the discovery of extremely graphic
photographic evidence. Due to the extremely sensitive nature of these
photographs and videos, the ongoing CID investigation, and the potential
for the criminal prosecution of several suspects, the photographic evidence
is not included in the body of my investigation. The pictures and videos
are available from the Criminal Investigative Command and the CTJF-7
prosecution team. In addition to the aforementioned crimes, there were
also abuses committed by members of the 325th MI Battalion, 205th MI
Brigade, and Joint Interrogation and Debriefing Center (JIDC). Specifically,
on 24 November 2003, SPC Luciana Spencer, 205th MI Brigade, sought to
degrade a detainee by having him strip and returned to cell naked.
(ANNEXES 26 and 53)
6. (S) I find that the intentional abuse of
detainees by military police personnel included the following acts:
a. (S) Punching, slapping, and kicking detainees;
jumping on their naked feet;
b. (S) Videotaping and photographing naked male
and female detainees;
c. (S) Forcibly arranging detainees in various
sexually explicit positions for photographing;
d. (S) Forcing detainees to remove their clothing
and keeping them naked for several days at a time;
e. (S) Forcing naked male detainees to wear
women’s underwear;
f. (S) Forcing groups of male detainees to
masturbate themselves while being photographed and videotaped;
g. (S) Arranging naked male detainees in a pile
and then jumping on them;
h. (S) Positioning a naked detainee on a MRE
Box, with a sandbag on his head, and attaching wires to his fingers,
toes, and penis to simulate electric torture;
i. (S) Writing “I am a Rapest” (sic) on the
leg of a detainee alleged to have forcibly raped a 15-year old fellow
detainee, and then photographing him naked;
j. (S) Placing a dog chain or strap around
a naked detainee’s neck and having a female Soldier pose for a picture;
k. (S) A male MP guard having sex with a female
detainee;
l. (S) Using military working dogs (without
muzzles) to intimidate and frighten detainees, and in at least one case
biting and severely injuring a detainee;
m. (S) Taking photographs of dead Iraqi detainees.
(ANNEXES 25 and 26)
7.(U) These findings
are amply supported by written confessions provided by several of the
suspects, written statements provided by detainees, and witness statements.
In reaching my findings, I have carefully considered the pre-existing
statements of the following witnesses and suspects (ANNEX
26):
a. (U) SPC Jeremy Sivits, 372nd MP Company
- Suspect
b. (U) SPC Sabrina Harman, 372nd MP Company
– Suspect
c. (U) SGT Javal S. Davis, 372nd MP Company
- Suspect
c. (U) PFC Lynndie R. England, 372nd MP Company
- Suspect
d. (U) Adel Nakhla, Civilian Translator, Titan
Corp., Assigned to the 205th MI Brigade- Suspect
(Names deleted)
8. (U) In addition, several detainees also described
the following acts of abuse, which under the circumstances, I find credible
based on the clarity of their statements and supporting evidence provided
by other witnesses (ANNEX 26):
a. (U) Breaking chemical lights and pouring
the phosphoric liquid on detainees;
b. (U) Threatening detainees with a charged
9mm pistol;
c. (U) Pouring cold water on naked detainees;
d. (U) Beating detainees with a broom handle
and a chair;
e. (U) Threatening male detainees with rape;
f. (U) Allowing a military police guard to
stitch the wound of a detainee who was injured after being slammed against
the wall in his cell;
g. (U) Sodomizing a detainee with a chemical
light and perhaps a broom stick.
h. (U) Using military working dogs to frighten
and intimidate detainees with threats of attack, and in one instance
actually biting a detainee.
9. (U) I have carefully considered the statements
provided by the following detainees, which under the circumstances I
find credible based on the clarity of their statements and supporting
evidence provided by other witnesses:
a. (U) Amjed Isail Waleed, Detainee # 151365
b. (U) Hiadar Saber Abed Miktub-Aboodi, Detainee
# 13077
c. (U) Huessin Mohssein Al-Zayiadi, Detainee
# 19446
d. (U) Kasim Mehaddi Hilas, Detainee # 151108
e. (U) Mohanded Juma Juma (sic), Detainee #
152307
f. (U) Mustafa Jassim Mustafa, Detainee # 150542
g. (U) Shalan Said Alsharoni, Detainee, # 150422
h. (U) Abd Alwhab Youss, Detainee # 150425
i. (U) Asad Hamza Hanfosh, Detainee # 152529
j. (U) Nori Samir Gunbar Al-Yasseri, Detainee
# 7787
k. (U) Thaar Salman Dawod, Detainee # 150427
l. (U) Ameen Sa’eed Al-Sheikh, Detainee # 151362
m. (U) Abdou Hussain Saad Faleh, Detainee # 18470
(ANNEX 26)
10. (U) I find that contrary to the provision
of AR 190-8, and the findings found in MG Ryder’s Report, Military Intelligence
(MI) interrogators and Other US Government Agency’s (OGA) interrogators
actively requested that MP guards set physical and mental conditions
for favorable interrogation of witnesses. Contrary to the findings
of MG Ryder’s Report, I find that personnel assigned to the 372ndMP
Company, 800th MP Brigade were directed to change facility procedures
to “set the conditions” for MI interrogations. I find no direct evidence
that MP personnel actually participated in those MI interrogations.
(ANNEXES 19, 21, 25, and 26).
11. (U) I reach this finding based on the actual
proven abuse that I find was inflicted on detainees and by the following
witness statements. (ANNEXES 25 and 26):
a. (U) SPC
Sabrina Harman, 372nd MP Company, stated in her sworn
statement regarding the incident where a detainee was placed on a box
with wires attached to his fingers, toes, and penis, “that her job was
to keep detainees awake.” She stated that MI was talking to CPL Grainer.
She stated: “MI wanted to get them to talk. It is Grainer
and Frederick’s job to do things for MI and OGA to get these people
to talk.”
b. (U) SGT Javal S. Davis,
372nd MP Company, stated in his sworn statement as follows:
“I witnessed prisoners in the MI hold section, wing 1A being
made to do various things that I would question morally. In Wing 1A
we were told that they had different rules and different SOP for treatment.
I never saw a set of rules or SOP for that section just word of mouth.
The Soldier in charge of 1A was Corporal Granier. He stated that the
Agents and MI Soldiers would ask him to do things, but nothing was ever
in writing he would complain (sic).” When asked why the
rules in 1A/1B were different than the rest of the wings, SGT Davis
stated: “The rest of the wings are regular prisoners and
1A/B are Military Intelligence (MI) holds.” When asked
why he did not inform his chain of command about this abuse, SGT Davis
stated: “ Because I assumed that if they were doing things
out of the ordinary or outside the guidelines, someone would have said
something. Also the wing belongs to MI and it appeared MI personnel
approved of the abuse.” SGT Davis also stated that he had
heard MI insinuate to the guards to abuse the inmates. When asked what
MI said he stated: “Loosen this guy up for us.” Make sure
he has abad night.” “Make sure he gets the
treatment.” He claimed these comments were made to CPL
Granier and SSG Frederick. Finally, SGT Davis stated that (sic): “the
MI staffs to my understanding have been giving Granier compliments on
the way he has been handling the MI holds. Example being statements
like, “Good job, they’re breaking down real fast. They answer every
question. They’re giving out good information, Finally, and Keep up
the good work . Stuff like that.”
c. (U) SPC Jason Kennel,
372nd MP Company, was asked if he were present when any
detainees were abused. He stated: “I saw them nude, but
MI would tell us to take away their mattresses, sheets, and clothes.”
He could not recall who in MI had instructed him to do
this, but commented that, “if they wanted me to do that they needed
to give me paperwork.” He was later informed that “we could not do
anything to embarrass the prisoners.”
d. (U) Mr. Adel L. Nakhla,
a US civilian contract translator was questioned about several detainees
accused of rape. He observed (sic): “They (detainees) were
all naked, a bunch of people from MI, the MP were there that night and
the inmates were ordered by SGT Granier and SGT Frederick ordered the
guys while questioning them to admit what they did. They made them
do strange exercises by sliding on their stomach, jump up and down,
throw water on them and made them some wet, called them all kinds of
names such as “gays” do they like to make love to guys, then they handcuffed
their hands together and their legs with shackles and started to stack
them on top of each other by insuring that the bottom guys penis will
touch the guy on tops butt.”
e. (U) SPC Neil A Wallin,
109th Area Support Medical Battalion, a medic testified
that: “Cell 1A was used to house high priority detainees
and cell 1B was used to house the high risk or trouble making detainees.
During my tour at the prison I observed that when the male detainees
were first brought to the facility, some of them were made to wear female
underwear, which I think was to somehow break them down.”
12. (U) I
find that prior to its deployment to Iraq for Operation Iraqi Freedom,
the 320th MP Battalion and the 372nd MP Company had received no training
in detention/internee operations. I also find that very
little instruction or training was provided to MP personnel on the applicable
rules of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners
of War, FM 27-10, AR 190-8, or FM 3-19.40. Moreover, I find that few,
if any, copies of the Geneva Conventions were ever made available to
MP personnel or detainees. (ANNEXES 21-24, 33, and multiple
witness statements)
13.(U) Another obvious
example of the Brigade Leadership not communicating with its Soldiers
or ensuring their tactical proficiency concerns the incident of detainee
abuse that occurred at Camp Bucca, Iraq, on May 12, 2003. Soldiers
from the 223rd MP Company reported to the 800th MP Brigade Command at
Camp Bucca, that four Military Police Soldiers from the 320th MP Battalion
had abused a number of detainees during inprocessing at Camp Bucca.
An extensive CID investigation determined that four soldiers from the
320th MP Battalion had kicked and beaten these detainees following a
transport mission from Talil Air Base. (ANNEXES 34 and 35)
14. (U) Formal charges under the UCMJ were preferred
against these Soldiers and an Article-32 Investigation conducted by
LTC Gentry. He recommended a general court martial for the four accused,
which BG Karpinski supported. Despite this documented abuse, there
is no evidence that BG Karpinski ever attempted to remind 800th MP Soldiers
of the requirements of the Geneva Conventions regarding detainee treatment
or took any steps to ensure that such abuse was not repeated. Nor is
there any evidence that LTC(P) Phillabaum, the commander of the Soldiers
involved in the Camp Bucca abuse incident, took any initiative to ensure
his Soldiers were properly trained regarding detainee treatment. (ANNEXES
35 and 62)
RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO PART ONE OF
THE INVESTIGATION:
1. (U) Immediately deploy to the Iraq Theater
an integrated multi-discipline Mobile Training Team (MTT) comprised
of subject matter experts in internment/resettlement operations, international
and operational law, information technology, facility management, interrogation
and intelligence gathering techniques, chaplains, Arab cultural awareness,
and medical practices as it pertains to I/R activities. This team needs
to oversee and conduct comprehensive training in all aspects of detainee
and confinement operations.
2. (U) That all military police and military
intelligence personnel involved in any aspect of detainee operations
or interrogation operations in CJTF-7, and subordinate units, be immediately
provided with training by an international/operational law attorney
on the specific provisions of The Law of Land Warfare FM 27-10, specifically
the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War,
Enemy Prisoners of War, Retained Personnel, Civilian Internees, and
Other Detainees, and AR 190-8.
3. (U) That a single commander in
CJTF-7 be responsible for overall detainee operations throughout the
Iraq Theater of Operations. I also recommend that the
Provost Marshal General of the Army assign a minimum of two (2) subject
matter experts, one officer and one NCO, to assist CJTF-7 in coordinating
detainee operations.
4. (U) That detention facility commanders and
interrogation facility commanders ensure that appropriate copies of
the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War
and notice of protections be made available in both English and the
detainees’ language and be prominently displayed in all detention facilities.
Detainees with questions regarding their treatment should be given the
full opportunity to read the Convention.
5. (U) That each detention facility commander
and interrogation facility commander publish a complete and comprehensive
set of Standing Operating Procedures (SOPs) regarding treatment of detainees,
and that all personnel be required to read the SOPs and sign a document
indicating that they have read and understand the SOPs.
6. (U) That in accordance with the recommendations
of MG Ryder’s Assessment Report, and my findings and recommendations
in this investigation, all units in the Iraq Theater of Operations conducting
internment/confinement/detainment operations in support of Operation
Iraqi Freedom be OPCON for all purposes, to include action under the
UCMJ, to CJTF-7.
7. (U) Appoint the C3, CJTF as the staff proponent
for detainee operations in the Iraq Joint Operations Area (JOA). (MG
Tom Miller, C3, CJTF-7, has been appointed by COMCJTF-7).
8. (U) That an inquiry UP AR 381-10, Procedure
15 be conducted to determine the extent of culpability of Military Intelligence
personnel, assigned to the 205th MI Brigade and the Joint Interrogation
and Debriefing Center (JIDC) regarding abuse of detainees at Abu Ghraib
(BCCF).
9. (U) That it is critical that the proponent
for detainee operations is assigned a dedicated Senior Judge Advocate,
with specialized training and knowledge of international and operational
law, to assist and advise on matters of detainee operations.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(PART TWO)
(U) The Investigation inquire into
detainee escapes and accountability lapses as reported by CJTF-7, specifically
allegations concerning these events at the Abu Ghraib Prison:
REGARDING PART TWO OF THE INVESTIGATION,
I MAKE THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC FINDINGS
OF FACT:
1. The 800th MP Brigade was responsible
for theater-wide Internment and Resettlement (I/R) operations. (ANNEXES
45 and 95)
2. (U) The 320th MP Battalion, 800th MP
Brigade was tasked with detainee operations at the Abu Ghraib Prison
Complex during the time period covered in this investigation. (ANNEXES
41, 45, and 59)
3. (U) The 310th MP Battalion, 800th MP
Brigade was tasked with detainee operations and Forward Operating Base
(FOB) Operations at the Camp Bucca Detention Facility until TOA on 26
February 2004. (ANNEXES 41 and 52)
4. (U) The 744th MP Battalion, 800th MP
Brigade was tasked with detainee operations and FOB Operations at the
HVD Detention Facility until TOA on 4 March 2004. (ANNEXES
41 and 55)
5. (U) The 530th MP Battalion, 800th MP
Brigade was tasked with detainee operations and FOB Operations at the
MEK holding facility until TOA on 15 March 2004. (ANNEXES
41 and 97)
6. (U) Detainee operations include accountability,
care, and well being of Enemy Prisoners of War, Retained Person, Civilian
Detainees, and Other Detainees, as well as Iraqi criminal prisoners.
(ANNEX 22)
7. (U) The accountability for detainees
is doctrinally an MP task IAW FM 3-19.40. (ANNEX 22)
8. (U) There is a general lack of knowledge,
implementation, and emphasis of basic legal, regulatory, doctrinal,
and command requirements within the 800th MP Brigade and its subordinate
units. (Multiple witness statements in ANNEXES 45-91).
9. (U) The handling of detainees and criminal
prisoners after in-processing was inconsistent from detention facility
to detention facility, compound to compound, encampment to encampment,
and even shift to shift throughout the 800th MP Brigade AOR. (ANNEX
37)
10. (U) Camp Bucca, operated by the 310th MP
Battalion, had a “Criminal Detainee In-Processing SOP” and a “Training
Outline” for transferring and releasing detainees, which appears to
have been followed. (ANNEXES 38 and 52)
11. (U) Incoming and outgoing detainees are
being documented in the National Detainee Reporting System (NDRS) and
Biometric Automated Toolset System (BATS) as required by regulation
at all detention facilities. However, it is underutilized and often
does not give a “real time” accurate picture of the detainee population
due to untimely updating. (ANNEX 56)
12. (U) There was a severe lapse in the accountability
of detainees at the Abu Ghraib Prison Complex. The 320th MP Battalion
used a self-created “change sheet” to document the transfer of a detainee
from one location to another. For proper accountability, it is imperative
that these change sheets be processed and the detainee manifest be updated
within 24 hours of movement. At Abu Ghraib, this process would often
take as long as 4 days to complete. This lag-time resulted in inaccurate
detainee Internment Serial Number (ISN) counts, gross differences in
the detainee manifest and the actual occupants of an individual compound,
and significant confusion of the MP Soldiers. The 320th MP Battalion
S-1, CPT Theresa Delbalso, and the S-3, MAJ David DiNenna, explained
that this breakdown was due to the lack of manpower to process change
sheets in a timely manner. (ANNEXES 39 and 98)
13. (U) The 320th Battalion TACSOP requires
detainee accountability at least 4 times daily at Abu Ghraib. However,
a detailed review of their operational journals revealed that these
accounts were often not done or not documented by the unit. Additionally,
there is no indication that accounting errors or the loss of a detainee
in the accounting process triggered any immediate corrective action
by the Battalion TOC. (ANNEX 44)
14. (U) There is a lack of standardization in
the way the 320th MP Battalion conducted physical counts of their detainees.
Each compound within a given encampment did their headcounts differently.
Some compounds had detainees line up in lines of 10, some had them sit
in rows, and some moved all the detainees to one end of the compound
and counted them as they passed to the other end of the compound. (ANNEX
98)
15. (U) FM 3-19.40 outlines the need for 2 roll
calls (100% ISN band checks) per day. The 320th MP Battalion did this
check only 2 times per week. Due to the lack of real-time updates to
the system, these checks were regularly inaccurate. (ANNEXES
22 and 98)
16. (U) The 800th MP Brigade and subordinate
units adopted non-doctrinal terms such as “band checks,” “roll-ups,”
and “call-ups,” which contributed to the lapses in accountability and
confusion at the soldier level. (Annexes 63, 88, and 98)
17. (U) Operational journals at the various
compounds and the 320th Battalion TOC contained numerous unprofessional
entries and flippant comments, which highlighted the lack of discipline
within the unit. There was no indication that the journals were ever
reviewed by anyone in their chain of command. (Annex 37)
18. (U) Accountability SOPs were not fully developed
and standing TACSOPs were widely ignored. Any SOPs that did exist were
not trained on, and were never distributed to the lowest level. Most
procedures were shelved at the unit TOC, rather than at the subordinate
units and guards mount sites. (Annexes 44, 67, 71, and 85)
19. (U) Accountability and facility operations
SOPs lacked specificity, implementation measures, and a system of checks
and balances to ensure compliance. (AnnexES 76 and 82)
20. (U) Basic Army Doctrine was not widely referenced
or utilized to develop the accountability practices throughout the 800th
MP Brigade’s subordinate units. Daily processing, accountability, and
detainee care appears to have been made up as the operations developed
with reliance on, and guidance from, junior members of the unit who
had civilian corrections experience. (Annex 21)
21. (U) Soldiers were poorly prepared and untrained
to conduct I/R operations prior to deployment, at the mobilization site,
upon arrival in theater, and throughout their mission. (ANNEXES
62, 63, and 69)
22. (U) The documentation provided to this investigation
identified 27 escapes or attempted escapes from the detention facilities
throughout the 800th MP Brigade’s AOR. Based on my assessment and detailed
analysis of the substandard accountability process maintained by the
800th MP Brigade, it is highly likely that there were several more unreported
cases of escape that were probably “written off” as administrative errors
or otherwise undocumented. 1LT Lewis Raeder, Platoon Leader, 372nd
MP Company, reported knowing about at least two additional escapes (one
from a work detail and one from a window) from Abu Ghraib (BCCF) that
were not documented. LTC Dennis McGlone, Commander, 744th MP Battalion,
detailed the escape of one detainee at the High Value Detainee Facility
who went to the latrine and then outran the guards and escaped. Lastly,
BG Janis Karpinski, Commander, 800th MP Brigade, stated that there were
more than 32 escapes from her holding facilities, which does not match
the number derived from the investigation materials. (ANNEXES
5-10, 45, 55, and 71)
23. (U) The Abu Ghraib and Camp Bucca detention
facilities are significantly over their intended maximum capacity while
the guard force is undermanned and under resourced. This imbalance
has contributed to the poor living conditions, escapes, and accountability
lapses at the various facilities. The overcrowding of the facilities
also limits the ability to identify and segregate leaders in the detainee
population who may be organizing escapes and riots within the facility.
(ANNEXES 6, 22, and 92)
24. (U) The screening, processing, and release
of detainees who should not be in custody takes too long and contributes
to the overcrowding and unrest in the detention facilities. There are
currently three separate release mechanisms in the theater-wide internment
operations. First, the apprehending unit can release a detainee if
there is a determination that their continued detention is not warranted.
Secondly, a criminal detainee can be released after it has been determined
that the detainee has no intelligence value, and that their release
would not be detrimental to society. BG Karpinski had signature authority
to release detainees in this second category. Lastly, detainees accused
of committing “Crimes Against the Coalition,” who are held throughout
the separate facilities in the CJTF-7 AOR, can be released upon a determination
that they are of no intelligence value and no longer pose a significant
threat to Coalition Forces. The release process for this category of
detainee is a screening by the local US Forces Magistrate Cell and a
review by a Detainee Release Board consisting of BG Karpinski, COL Marc
Warren, SJA, CJTF-7, and MG Barbara Fast, C-2, CJTF-7. MG Fast is the
“Detainee Release Authority” for detainees being held for committing
crimes against the coalition. According to BG Karpinski, this category
of detainee makes up more than 60% of the total detainee population,
and is the fastest growing category. However, MG Fast, according to
BG Karpinski, routinely denied the board’s recommendations to release
detainees in this category who were no longer deemed a threat and clearly
met the requirements for release. According to BG Karpinski, the extremely
slow and ineffective release process has significantly contributed to
the overcrowding of the facilities. (ANNEXES 40, 45, and
46)
25. (U) After Action Reviews (AARs) are not
routinely being conducted after an escape or other serious incident.
No lessons learned seem to have been disseminated to subordinate units
to enable corrective action at the lowest level. The Investigation
Team requested copies of AARs, and none were provided. (Multiple
Witness Statements)
26. (U) Lessons learned (i.e. Findings and Recommendations
from various 15-6 Investigations concerning escapes and accountability
lapses) were rubber stamped as approved and ordered implemented by BG
Karpinski. There is no evidence that the majority of her orders directing
the implementation of substantive changes were ever acted upon. Additionally,
there was no follow-up by the command to verify the corrective actions
were taken. Had the findings and recommendations contained within their
own investigations been analyzed and actually implemented by BG Karpinski,
many of the subsequent escapes, accountability lapses, and cases of
abuse may have been prevented. (ANNEXES 5-10)
27. (U) The perimeter lighting around Abu Ghraib
and the detention facility at Camp Bucca is inadequate and needs to
be improved to illuminate dark areas that have routinely become avenues
of escape. (ANNEX 6)
28. (U) Neither the camp rules nor the provisions
of the Geneva Conventions are posted in English or in the language of
the detainees at any of the detention facilities in the 800th MP Brigade’s
AOR, even after several investigations had annotated the lack of this
critical requirement. (Multiple Witness Statements and the
Personal Observations of the Investigation Team)
29. (U) The Iraqi guards at Abu Ghraib BCCF)
demonstrate questionable work ethics and loyalties, and are a potentially
dangerous contingent within the Hard-Site. These guards have furnished
the Iraqi criminal inmates with contraband, weapons, and information.
Additionally, they have facilitated the escape of at least one detainee.
(ANNEX 8 and 26-SPC Polak’s Statement)
30. (U) In general, US civilian contract personnel
(Titan Corporation, CACI, etc…), third country nationals, and local
contractors do not appear to be properly supervised within the detention
facility at Abu Ghraib. During our on-site inspection, they wandered
about with too much unsupervised free access in the detainee area.
Having civilians in various outfits (civilian and DCUs) in and about
the detainee area causes confusion and may have contributed to the difficulties
in the accountability process and with detecting escapes. (ANNEX
51, Multiple Witness Statements, and the Personal Observations of the
Investigation Team)
31. (U) SGM Marc Emerson, Operations SGM, 320th
MP Battalion, contended that the Detainee Rules of Engagement (DROE)
and the general principles of the Geneva Convention were briefed at
every guard mount and shift change on Abu Ghraib. However, none of
our witnesses, nor our personal observations, support his contention.
I find that SGM Emerson was not a credible witness. (ANNEXES
45, 80, and the Personal Observations of the Investigation Team)
32. (U) Several interviewees insisted that the
MP and MI Soldiers at Abu Ghraib (BCCF) received regular training on
the basics of detainee operations; however, they have been unable to
produce any verifying documentation, sign-in rosters, or soldiers who
can recall the content of this training. (Annexes 59, 80,
and the Absence of any Training Records)
33. (S/NF) The various detention facilities
operated by the 800th MP Brigade have routinely held persons brought
to them by Other Government Agencies (OGAs) without accounting for them,
knowing their identities, or even the reason for their detention. The
Joint Interrogation and Debriefing Center (JIDC) at Abu Ghraib called
these detainees “ghost detainees.” On at least one occasion, the 320th
MP Battalion at Abu Ghraib held a handful of “ghost detainees” (6-8)
for OGAs that they moved around within the facility to hide them from
a visiting International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) survey team.
This maneuver was deceptive, contrary to Army Doctrine, and in violation
of international law. (Annex 53)
34. (U) The following riots, escapes, and shootings
have been documented and reported to this Investigation Team. Although
there is no data from other missions of similar size and duration to
compare the number of escapes with, the most significant factors derived
from these reports are twofold. First, investigations and SIRs lacked
critical data needed to evaluate the details of each incident. Second,
each investigation seems to have pointed to the same types of deficiencies;
however, little to nothing was done to correct the problems and to implement
the recommendations as was ordered by BG Karpinski, nor was there any
command emphasis to ensure these deficiencies were corrected:
a. (U) 4
June 03- This escape was mentioned in the 15-6 Investigation covering
the 13 June 03 escape, recapture, and shootings of detainees at Camp
Vigilant (320th MP Battalion). However, no investigation
or additional information was provided as requested by this investigation
team. (ANNEX 7)
b. (U) 9
June 03- Riot and shootings of five detainees at Camp Cropper. (115th
MP Battalion) Several detainees allegedly rioted after
a detainee was subdued by MPs of the 115th MP Battalion after striking
a guard in compound B of Camp Cropper. A 15-6 investigation by 1LT
Magowan (115th MP Battalion, Platoon Leader) concluded that a detainee
had acted up and hit an MP. After being subdued, one of the MPs took
off his DCU top and flexed his muscles to the detainees, which further
escalated the riot. The MPs were overwhelmed and the guards fired lethal
rounds to protect the life of the compound MPs, whereby 5 detainees
were wounded. Contributing factors were poor communications, no clear
chain of command, facility-obstructed views of posted guards, the QRF
did not have non-lethal equipment, and the SOP was inadequate and outdated.
(ANNEX 5)
c. (U) 12
June 03- Escape and recapture of detainee #8399, escape and shooting
of detainee # 7166, and attempted escape of an unidentified detainee
from Camp Cropper Holding Area (115th MP Battalion). Several
detainees allegedly made their escape in the nighttime hours prior to
0300. A 15-6 investigation by CPT Wendlandt (115th MP Battalion, S-2)
concluded that the detainees allegedly escaped by crawling under the
wire at a location with inadequate lighting. One detainee was stopped
prior to escape. An MP of the 115th MP Battalion search team recaptured
detainee # 8399, and detainee # 7166 was shot and killed by a Soldier
during the recapture process. Contributing factors were overcrowding,
poor lighting, and the nature of the hardened criminal detainees at
that location. It is of particular note that the command was informed
at least 24 hours in advance of the upcoming escape attempt and started
doing amplified announcements in Arabic stating the camp rules. The
investigation pointed out that rules and guidelines were not posted
in the camps in the detainees’ native languages. (ANNEX
6)
d. (U) 13
June 03- Escape and recapture of detainee # 8968 and the shooting of
eight detainees at Abu Ghraib (BCCF) (320th MP Battalion).
Several detainees allegedly attempted to escape at about 1400 hours
from the Camp Vigilant Compound, Abu Ghraib (BCCF). A 15-6 investigation
by CPT Wyks (400th MP Battalion, S-1) concluded that the detainee allegedly
escaped by sliding under the wire while the tower guard was turned in
the other direction. This detainee was subsequently apprehended by
the QRF. At about 1600 the same day, 30-40 detainees rioted and pelted
three interior MP guards with rocks. One guard was injured and the
tower guards fired lethal rounds at the rioters injuring 7 and killing
1 detainee. (ANNEX 7)
e. (U) 05
November 03- Escape of detainees # 9877 and # 10739 from Abu Ghraib
(320th MP Battalion). Several detainees allegedly escaped
at 0345 from the Hard-Site, Abu Ghraib (BCCF). An SIR was initiated
by SPC Warner (320th MP Battalion, S-3 RTO). The SIR indicated that
2 criminal prisoners escaped through their cell window in tier 3A of
the Hard-Site. No information on findings, contributing factors, or
corrective action has been provided to this investigation team. (ANNEX
11)
f. (U) 07
November 03- Escape of detainee # 14239 from Abu Ghraib (320th MP Battalion).
A detainee allegedly escaped at 1330 from Compound 2 of the Ganci Encampment,
Abu Ghraib (BCCF). An SIR was initiated by SSG Hydro (320th MP Battalion,
S-3 Asst. NCOIC). The SIR indicated that a detainee escaped from the
North end of the compound and was discovered missing during distribution
of the noon meal, but there is no method of escape listed in the SIR.
No information on findings, contributing factors, or corrective action
has been provided to this investigation team. (ANNEX 12)
g. (U) 08
November 03- Escape of detainees # 115089, # 151623, # 151624, # 116734,
# 116735, and # 116738 from Abu Ghraib (320th MP Battalion).
Several detainees allegedly escaped at 2022 from Compound 8 of the Ganci
encampment, Abu Ghraib. An SIR was initiated by MAJ DiNenna (320th
MP Battalion, S-3). The SIR indicated that 5-6 prisoners escaped from
the North end of the compound, but there is no method of escape listed
in the SIR. No information on findings, contributing factors, or corrective
action has been provided to this investigation team. (ANNEX
13)
h. (U) 24
November 03- Riot and shooting of 12 detainees # 150216, #150894, #153096,
153165, #153169, #116361, #153399, #20257, #150348, #152616, #116146,
and #152156 at Abu Ghraib(320th MP Battalion).
Several detainees allegedly began to riot at about 1300 in all of the
compounds at the Ganci encampment. This resulted in the shooting deaths
of 3 detainees, 9 wounded detainees, and 9 injured US Soldiers. A
15-6 investigation by COL Bruce Falcone (220th MP Brigade, Deputy Commander)
concluded that the detainees rioted in protest of their living conditions,
that the riot turned violent, the use of non-lethal force was ineffective,
and, after the 320th MP Battalion CDR executed “Golden Spike,” the emergency
containment plan, the use of deadly force was authorized. Contributing
factors were lack of comprehensive training of guards, poor or non-existent
SOPs, no formal guard-mount conducted prior to shift, no rehearsals
or ongoing training, the mix of less than lethal rounds with lethal
rounds in weapons, no AARs being conducted after incidents, ROE not
posted and not understood, overcrowding, uniforms not standardized,
and poor communication between the command and Soldiers. (ANNEX
8)
i. (U) 24
November 03- Shooting of detainee at Abu Ghraib(320th
MP Battalion). A detainee allegedly had a pistol in his
cell and around 1830 an extraction team shot him with less than lethal
and lethal rounds in the process of recovering the weapon. A 15-6 investigation
by COL Bruce Falcone (220th Brigade, Deputy Commander) concluded
that one of the detainees in tier 1A of the Hard Site had gotten a pistol
and a couple of knives from an Iraqi Guard working in the encampment.
Immediately upon receipt of this information, an ad-hoc extraction team
consisting of MP and MI personnel conducted what they called a routine
cell search, which resulted in the shooting of an MP and the detainee.
Contributing factors were a corrupt Iraqi Guard, inadequate SOPs, the
Detention ROE in place at the time was ineffective due to the numerous
levels of authorization needed for use of lethal force, poorly trained
MPs, unclear lanes of responsibility, and ambiguous relationship between
the MI and MP assets. (ANNEX 8)
j. (U) 13
December 03- Shooting by non-lethal means into crowd at Abu Ghraib(320th
MP Battalion). Several detainees allegedly got into a
detainee-on-detainee fight around 1030 in Compound 8 of the Ganci encampment,
Abu Ghraib. An SIR was initiated by SSG Matash (320th MP Battalion,
S-3 Section). The SIR indicated that there was a fight in the compound
and the MPs used a non-lethal crowd-dispersing round to break up the
fight, which was successful. No information on findings, contributing
factors, or corrective action has been provided to this investigation
team. (ANNEX 14)
k. (U) 13
December 03- Shooting by non-lethal means into crowd at Abu Ghraib(320th
MP Battalion). Several detainees allegedly got into a
detainee-on-detainee fight around 1120 in Compound 2 of the Ganci encampment,
Abu Ghraib. An SIR was initiated by SSG Matash (320th MP Battalion,
S-3 Section). The SIR indicated that there was a fight in the compound
and the MPs used two non-lethal shots to disperse the crowd, which was
successful. No information on findings, contributing factors, or corrective
action has been provided to this investigation team. (ANNEX
15)
l. (U) 13
December 03- Shooting by non-lethal means into crowd at Abu Ghraib(320th
MP Battalion). Approximately 30-40 detainees allegedly
got into a detainee-on-detainee fight around 1642 in Compound 3 of the
Ganci encampment, Abu Ghraib (BCCF). An SIR was initiated by SSG Matash
(320th MP Battalion, S-3 Section). The SIR indicates that there was
a fight in the compound and the MPs used a non-lethal crowd-dispersing
round to break up the fight, which was successful. No information on
findings, contributing factors, or corrective action has been provided
to this investigation team. (ANNEX 16)
m. (U) 17
December 03- Shooting by non-lethal means of detainee from Abu Ghraib(320th
MP Battalion). Several detainees allegedly assaulted
an MP at 1459 inside the Ganci Encampment, Abu Ghraib (BCCF). An SIR
was initiated by SSG Matash (320th MP BRIGADE, S-3 Section). The SIR
indicated that three detainees assaulted an MP, which resulted in the
use of a non-lethal shot that calmed the situation. No information
on findings, contributing factors, or corrective action has been provided
to this investigation team. (ANNEX 17)
n. (U) 07
January 04- Escape of detainee #115032 from Camp Bucca(310th
MP Battalion). A detainee allegedly escaped between the
hours of 0445 and 0640 from Compound 12, of Camp Bucca. Investigation
by CPT Kaires (310th MP Battalion S-3) and CPT Holsombeck (724th
MP Battalion S-3) concluded that the detainee escaped through an undetected
weakness in the wire. Contributing factors were inexperienced guards,
lapses in accountability, complacency, lack of leadership presence,
poor visibility, and lack of clear and concise communication between
the guards and the leadership. (ANNEX 9)
o. (U) 12
January 04- Escape of Detainees #115314 and #109950 as well as the escape
and recapture of 5 unknown detainees at the Camp Bucca Detention Facility
(310th MP Battalion). Several detainees allegedly escaped
around 0300 from Compound 12, of Camp Bucca. An AR 15-6 Investigation
by LTC Leigh Coulter (800th MP Brigade, OIC Camp Arifjan Detachment)
concluded that three of the detainees escaped through the front holding
cell during conditions of limited visibility due to fog. One of the
detainees was noticed, shot with a non-lethal round, and returned to
his holding compound. That same night, 4 detainees exited through the
wire on the South side of the camp and were seen and apprehended by
the QRF. Contributing factors were the lack of a coordinated effort
for emplacement of MPs during implementation of the fog plan, overcrowding,
and poor communications. (ANNEX 10)
p. (U) 14
January 04- Escape of detainee #12436 and missing Iraqi guard from Hard-Site,
Abu Ghraib (320th MP Battalion). A detainee allegedly
escaped at 1335 from the Hard Site at Abu Ghraib (BCCF). An SIR was
initiated by SSG Hydro (320th MP Battalion, S-3 Asst. NCOIC). The SIR
indicates that an Iraqi guard assisted a detainee to escape by signing
him out on a work detail and disappearing with him. At the time of
the second SIR, neither missing person had been located. No information
on findings, contributing factors, or corrective action has been provided
to this investigation team. (ANNEX 99)
q. (U) 26
January 04- Escape of detainees #s 115236, 116272, and 151933 from Camp
Bucca(310th MP Battalion).
Several Detainees allegedly escaped between the hours of 0440 and 0700
during a period of intense fog. Investigation by CPT Kaires (310th
MP Battalion S-3) concluded that the detainees crawled under a fence
when visibility was only 10-15 meters due to fog. Contributing factors
were the limited visibility (darkness under foggy conditions), lack
of proper accountability reporting, inadequate number of guards, commencement
of detainee feeding during low visibility operations, and poorly rested
MPs. (ANNEX 18)
36. (U) As I have previously indicated, this
investigation determined that there was virtually a complete lack of
detailed SOPs at any of the detention facilities. Moreover, despite
the fact that there were numerous reported escapes at detention facilities
throughout Iraq (in excess of 35), AR 15-6 Investigations following
these escapes were simply forgotten or ignored by the Brigade Commander
with no dissemination to other facilities. After-Action Reports and
Lessons Learned, if done at all, remained at individual facilities and
were not shared among other commanders or soldiers throughout the Brigade.
The Command never issued standard TTPs for handling escape incidents.
(AnnexES 5-10, Multiple Witness Statements, and the Personal
Observations of the Investigation Team)
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING PART TWO
OF THE INVESTIGATION:
(U) ANNEX 100 of this
investigation contains a detailed and referenced series of recommendations
for improving the detainee accountability practices throughout the OIF
area of operations. (U) Accountability practices throughout any particular
detention facility must be standardized and in accordance with applicable
regulations and international law. (U) The NDRS and BATS accounting
systems must be expanded and used to their fullest extent to facilitate
real time updating when detainees are moved and or transferred from
one location to another. (U) “Change sheets,” or their doctrinal equivalent
must be immediately processed and updated into the system to ensure
accurate accountability. The detainee roll call or ISN counts must
match the manifest provided to the compound guards to ensure proper
accountability of detainees. (U) Develop, staff, and implement comprehensive
and detailed SOPs utilizing the lessons learned from this investigation
as well as any previous findings, recommendations, and reports. (U)
SOPs must be written, disseminated, trained on, and understood at the
lowest level.(U) Iraqi criminal prisoners must be held in separate facilities
from any other category of detainee. (U) All of the compounds should
be wired into the master manifest whereby MP Soldiers can account for
their detainees in real time and without waiting for their change sheets
to be processed. This would also have the change sheet serve as a way
to check up on the accuracy of the manifest as updated by each compound.
The BATS and NDRS system can be utilized for this function.(U) Accountability
lapses, escapes, and disturbances within the detainment facilities must
be immediately reported through both the operational and administrative
Chain of Command via a Serious Incident Report (SIR). The SIRs must
then be tracked and followed by daily SITREPs until the situation is
resolved. (U) Detention Rules of Engagement (DROE), Interrogation Rules
of Engagement (IROE), and the principles of the Geneva Conventions need
to be briefed at every shift change and guard mount. (U) AARs must
be conducted after serious incidents at any given facility. The observations
and corrective actions that develop from the AARs must be analyzed by
the respective MP Battalion S-3 section, developed into a plan of action,
shared with the other facilities, and implemented as a matter of policy.
(U) There must be significant structural improvements at each of the
detention facilities. The needed changes include significant enhancement
of perimeter lighting, additional chain link fencing, staking down of
all concertina wire, hard site development, and expansion of Abu Ghraib
(BCCF) . (U) The Geneva Conventions and the facility rules must be
prominently displayed in English and the language of the detainees at
each compound and encampment at every detention facility IAW AR 190-8.
(U) Further restrict US civilians and other contractors’ access throughout
the facility. Contractors and civilians must be in an authorized and
easily identifiable uniform to be more easily distinguished from the
masses of detainees in civilian clothes. (U) Facilities must have a
stop movement/transfer period of at least 1 hour prior to every 100%
detainee roll call and ISN counts to ensure accurate accountability.(U)
The method for doing head counts of detainees within a given compound
must be standardized. (U) Those military units conducting I/R operations
must know of, train on, and constantly reference the applicable Army
Doctrine and CJTF command policies. The references provided in this
report cover nearly every deficiency I have enumerated. Although they
do not, and cannot, make up for leadership shortfalls, all soldiers,
at all levels, can use them to maintain standardized operating procedures
and efficient accountability practices.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(PART THREE)
(U) Investigate the training, standards,
employment, command policies, internal procedures, and command climate
in the 800th MP Brigade, as appropriate:
(Names deleted)
(ANNEXES 45-91)
REGARDING PART THREE OF THE INVESTIGATION,
I MAKE THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. (U) I find that BG Janis Karpinski took command
of the 800th MP Brigade on 30 June 2003 from BG Paul Hill. BG Karpinski
has remained in command since that date. The 800th MP Brigade is comprised
of eight MP battalions in the Iraqi TOR: 115th MP Battalion, 310th
MP Battalion, 320th MP Battalion, 324th MP Battalion, 400th MP Battalion,
530th MP Battalion, 724th MP Battalion, and 744th MP Battalion.
(ANNEXES 41 and 45)
2. (U) Prior to BG Karpinski taking command,
members of the 800th MP Brigade believed they would be allowed to go
home when all the detainees were released from the Camp Bucca Theater
Internment Facility following the cessation of major ground combat on
1 May 2003. At one point, approximately 7,000 to 8,000 detainees were
held at Camp Bucca. Through Article-5 Tribunals and a screening process,
several thousand detainees were released. Many in the command believed
they would go home when the detainees were released. In late May-early
June 2003 the 800th MPBrigade was given a new mission to
manage the Iraqi penal system and several detention centers. This new
mission meant Soldiers would not redeploy to CONUS when anticipated.
Morale suffered, and over the next few months there did not appear to
have been any attempt by the Command to mitigate this morale problem.
(ANNEXES 45 and 96)
3. (U) There is abundant evidence in the statements
of numerous witnesses that soldiers throughout the 800th MP Brigade
were not proficient in their basic MOS skills, particularly regarding
internment/resettlement operations. Moreover, there is no evidence
that the command, although aware of these deficiencies, attempted to
correct them in any systemic manner other than ad hoc training by individuals
with civilian corrections experience. (Multiple Witness
Statements and the Personal Observations of the Investigation Team)
4. (U) I find that the 800th MP Brigade was
not adequately trained for a mission that included operating a prison
or penal institution at Abu Ghraib Prison Complex. As the Ryder Assessment
found, I also concur that units of the 800th MP Brigade did not receive
corrections-specific training during their mobilization period. MP
units did not receive pinpoint assignments prior to mobilization and
during the post mobilization training, and thus could not train for
specific missions. The training that was accomplished at the mobilization
sites were developed and implemented at the company level with little
or no direction or supervision at the Battalion and Brigade levels,
and consisted primarily of common tasks and law enforcement training.
However, I found no evidence that the Command, although aware of this
deficiency, ever requested specific corrections training from the Commandant
of the Military Police School, the US Army Confinement Facility at Mannheim,
Germany, the Provost Marshal General of the Army, or the US Army Disciplinary
Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. (ANNEXES 19 and 76)
5. (U) I find that without adequate training
for a civilian internee detention mission, Brigade personnel relied
heavily on individuals within the Brigade who had civilian corrections
experience, including many who worked as prison guards or corrections
officials in their civilian jobs. Almost every witness we interviewed
had no familiarity with the provisions of AR 190-8 or FM 3-19.40. It
does not appear that a Mission Essential Task List (METL) based on in-theater
missions was ever developed nor was a training plan implemented throughout
the Brigade. (ANNEXES 21, 22, 67, and 81)
6. (U) I also find, as did MG Ryder’s Team,
that the 800th MP Brigade as a whole, was understrength for the mission
for which it was tasked. Army Doctrine dictates that an I/R Brigade
can be organized with between 7 and 21 battalions, and that the average
battalion size element should be able to handle approximately 4000 detainees
at a time. This investigation indicates that BG Karpinski and her staff
did a poor job allocating resources throughout the Iraq JOA. Abu Ghraib
(BCCF) normally housed between 6000 and 7000 detainees, yet it was operated
by only one battalion. In contrast, the HVD Facility maintains only
about 100 detainees, and is also run by an entire battalion. (ANNEXES
19, 22, and 96)
7. (U) Reserve Component units do not have an
individual replacement system to mitigate medical or other losses.
Over time, the 800th MP Brigade clearly suffered from personnel shortages
through release from active duty (REFRAD) actions, medical evacuation,
and demobilization. In addition to being severely undermanned, the
quality of life for Soldiers assigned to Abu Ghraib (BCCF) was extremely
poor. There was no DFAC, PX, barbershop, or MWR facilities. There
were numerous mortar attacks, random rifle and RPG attacks, and a serious
threat to Soldiers and detainees in the facility. The prison complex
was also severely overcrowded and the Brigade lacked adequate resources
and personnel to resolve serious logistical problems. Finally, because
of past associations and familiarity of Soldiers within the Brigade,
it appears that friendship often took precedence over appropriate leader
and subordinate relationships. (ANNEX 101, Multiple Witness
Statements, and the Personal Observations of the Investigation Team)
8. (U) With respect to the 800th MP Brigade
mission at Abu Ghraib (BCCF), I find that there was clear friction and
lack of effective communication between the Commander, 205th MI Brigade,
who controlled FOB Abu Ghraib (BCCF) after 19 November 2003, and the
Commander, 800th MP Brigade, who controlled detainee operations inside
the FOB. There was no clear delineation of responsibility between commands,
little coordination at the command level, and no integration of the
two functions. Coordination occurred at the lowest possible levels
with little oversight by commanders. (ANNEXES 31, 45, and
46)
9. (U) I find that this ambiguous command relationship
was exacerbated by a CJTF-7 Fragmentary Order (FRAGO) 1108 issued on
19 November 2003. Paragraph 3.C.8, Assignment of 205th MI Brigade Commander’s
Responsibilities for the Baghdad Central Confinement Facility, states
as follows:
3.C.8. A. (U) 205 MI BRIGADE.
3.C.8. A. 1. (U) EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
COMMANDER 205 MI BRIGADE ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE BAGHDAD CONFINEMENT
FACILITY (BCCF) AND IS APPOINTED THE FOB COMMANDER. UNITS CURRENTLY
AT ABU GHRAIB (BCCF) ARE TACON TO 205 MI BRIGADE FOR “SECURITY OF
DETAINEES AND FOB PROTECTION.”
Although not supported by BG Karpinski, FRAGO
1108 made all of the MP units at Abu Ghraib TACON to the Commander,
205th MI Brigade. This effectively made an MI Officer, rather than
an MP Officer, responsible for the MP units conducting detainee operations
at that facility. This is not doctrinally sound due to the different
missions and agendas assigned to each of these respective specialties.
(ANNEX 31)
10 (U) Joint Publication 0-2, Unified Action
Armed Forces (UNAAF), 10 July 2001 defines Tactical Control (TACON)
as the detailed direction and control of movements or maneuvers within
the operational area necessary to accomplish assigned missions or tasks.
(ANNEX 42)
“TACON is the command authority over
assigned or attached forces or commands or military capability made
available for tasking that is limited to the detailed direction and
control of movements or maneuvers within the operational area necessary
to accomplish assigned missions or tasks. TACON is inherent in OPCON
and may be delegated to and exercised by commanders at any echelon at
or below the level of combatant commander.”
11. (U) Based on all the facts and circumstances
in this investigation, I find that there was little, if any, recognition
of this TACON Order by the 800th MP Brigade or the 205th MI Brigade.
Further, there was no evidence if the Commander, 205th MI Brigade clearly
informed the Commander, 800th MP Brigade, and specifically the Commander,
320th MP Battalion assigned at Abu Ghraib (BCCF), on the specific requirements
of this TACON relationship. (ANNEXES 45 and 46)
12. (U) It is clear from a comprehensive review
of witness statements and personal interviews that the 320th MP Battalion
and 800th MP Brigade continued to function as if they were responsible
for the security, health and welfare, and overall security of detainees
within Abu Ghraib (BCCF) prison. Both BG Karpinski and COL Pappas clearly
behaved as if this were still the case. (ANNEXES 45 and
46)
13. (U) With respect to the 320th MP Battalion,
I find that the Battalion Commander, LTC (P) Jerry Phillabaum, was an
extremely ineffective commander and leader. Numerous witnesses confirm
that the Battalion S-3, MAJ David W. DiNenna, basically ran the battalion
on a day-to-day basis. At one point, BG Karpinski sent LTC (P) Phillabaum
to Camp Arifjan, Kuwait for approximately two weeks, apparently to give
him some relief from the pressure he was experiencing as the 320th Battalion
Commander. This movement to Camp Arifjan immediately followed a briefing
provided by LTC (P) Phillabaum to the CJTF-7 Commander, LTG Sanchez,
near the end of October 2003. BG Karpinski placed LTC Ronald Chew,
Commander of the 115th MP Battalion, in charge of the 320th MP Battalion
for a period of approximately two weeks. LTC Chew was also in command
of the 115th MP Battalion assigned to Camp Cropper, BIAP, Iraq. I could
find no orders, either suspending or relieving LTC (P) Phillabaum from
command, nor any orders placing LTC Chew in command of the 320th. In
addition, there was no indication this removal and search for a replacement
was communicated to the Commander CJTF-7, the Commander 377th TSC, or
to Soldiers in the 320th MP Battalion. Temporarily removing one commander
and replacing him with another serving Battalion Commander without an
order and without notifying superior or subordinate commands is without
precedent in my military career. LTC (P) Phillabaum was also reprimanded
for lapses in accountability that resulted in several escapes. The
320th MP Battalion was stigmatized as a unit due to previous detainee
abuse which occurred in May 2003 at the Bucca Theater Internment Facility
(TIF), while under the command of LTC (P) Phillabaum. Despite his proven
deficiencies as both a commander and leader, BG Karpinski allowed LTC
(P) Phillabaum to remain in command of her most troubled battalion guarding,
by far, the largest number of detainees in the 800th MP Brigade. LTC
(P) Phillabaum was suspended from his duties by LTG Sanchez, CJTF-7
Commander on 17 January 2004. (ANNEXES 43, 45, and 61)
14. (U) During the course of this investigation
I conducted a lengthy interview with BG Karpinski that lasted over four
hours, and is included verbatim in the investigation Annexes. BG Karpinski
was extremely emotional during much of her testimony. What I found
particularly disturbing in her testimony was her complete unwillingness
to either understand or accept that many of the problems inherent in
the 800th MP Brigade were caused or exacerbated by poor leadership and
the refusal of her command to both establish and enforce basic standards
and principles among its soldiers. (ANNEX 45 and the Personal
Observations of the Interview Team)
15. (U) BG Karpinski alleged that she received
no help from the Civil Affairs Command, specifically, no assistance
from either BG John Kern or COL Tim Regan. She blames much of the abuse
that occurred in Abu Ghraib (BCCF) on MI personnel and stated that MI
personnel had given the MPs “ideas” that led to detainee abuse. In
addition, she blamed the 372nd Company Platoon Sergeant, SFC Snider,
the Company Commander, CPT Reese, and the First Sergeant, MSG Lipinski,
for the abuse. She argued that problems in Abu Ghraib were the fault
of COL Pappas and LTC Jordan because COL Pappas was in charge of FOB
Abu Ghraib. (ANNEX 45)
16. (U) BG Karpinski also implied during her
testimony that the criminal abuses that occurred at Abu Ghraib (BCCF)
might have been caused by the ultimate disposition of the detainee abuse
cases that originally occurred at Camp Bucca in May 2003. She stated
that “about the same time those incidents were taking place
out of Baghdad Central, the decisions were made to give the guilty people
at Bucca plea bargains. So, the system communicated to the soldiers,
the worst that’s gonna happen is, you’re gonna go home.”
I think it important to point out that almost every witness testified
that the serious criminal abuse of detainees at Abu Ghraib (BCCF) occurred
in late October and early November 2003. The photographs and statements
clearly support that the abuses occurred during this time period. The
Bucca cases were set for trial in January 2004 and were not finally
disposed of until 29 December 2003. There is entirely no evidence that
the decision of numerous MP personnel to intentionally abuse detainees
at Abu Ghrabid (BCCF) was influenced in any respect by the Camp Bucca
cases. (ANNEXES 25, 26, and 45)
17. (U) Numerous witnesses stated that the 800th
MP Brigade S-1, MAJ Hinzman and S-4, MAJ Green, were essentially dysfunctional,
but that despite numerous complaints, these officers were not replaced.
This had a detrimental effect on the Brigade Staff’s effectiveness and
morale. Moreover, the Brigade Command Judge Advocate, LTC James O’Hare,
appears to lack initiative and was unwilling to accept responsibility
for any of his actions. LTC Gary Maddocks, the Brigade XO did not
properly supervise the Brigade staff by failing to lay out staff priorities,
take overt corrective action when needed, and supervise their daily
functions. (ANNEXES 45, 47, 48, 62, and 67)
18. (U) In addition to poor morale and staff
inefficiencies, I find that the 800th MP Brigade did not articulate
or enforce clear and basic Soldier and Army standards. I specifically
found these examples of unenforced standards:
a. There was no clear uniform standard for any
MP Soldiers assigned detention duties. Despite the fact that hundreds
of former Iraqi soldiers and officers were detainees, MP personnel were
allowed to wear civilian clothes in the FOB after duty hours while carrying
weapons. (ANNEXES 51 and 74)
b. Some Soldiers wrote poems and other sayings
on their helmets and soft caps. (ANNEXES 51 and 74)
c. In addition, numerous officers and senior
NCOs have been reprimanded/disciplined for misconduct during this period.
Those disciplined include; (ANNEXES 43 and 102)
1). (U) BG Janis Karpinski, Commander, 800th
MP Brigade
- Memorandum of Admonishment by LTG Sanchez,
Commander, CJTF-7, on 17 January 2004.
2). (U) LTC (P) Jerry Phillabaum, Commander,
320th MP Battalion
- GOMOR from BG Karpinski, Commander 800th
MP Brigade, on 10 November 2003, for lack of leadership and for failing
to take corrective security measures as ordered by the Brigade Commander;
filed locally
- Suspended by BG Karpinski, Commander 800th
MP Brigade, 17 January 2004; Pending Relief for Cause, for dereliction
of duty
3). (U) LTC Dale Burtyk, Commander, 400th MP
Battalion
- GOMOR from BG Karpinski, Commander 800th MP
Brigade, on 20 August 2003, for failure to properly train his Soldiers.
(Soldier had negligent discharge of M-16 while exiting his vehicle,
round went into fuel tank); filed locally.
4). (U) MAJ David DiNenna, S-3, 320th MP Battalion
- GOMOR from LTG McKiernan, Commander CFLCC,
on 25 May 2003, for dereliction of duty for failing to report a violation
of CENTCOM General Order #1 by a subordinate Field Grade Officer and
Senior Noncommissioned Officer, which he personally observed; returned
to soldier unfiled.
- GOMOR from BG Karpinski, Commander 800th MP
Brigade, on 10 November 03, for failing to take corrective security
measures as ordered by the Brigade Commander; filed locally.
5). (U) MAJ Stacy Garrity, Finance Officer,
800th MP Brigade
- GOMOR from LTG McKiernan, Commander CFLCC,
on 25 May 2003, for violation of CENTCOM General Order #1, consuming
alcohol with an NCO; filed locally.
6). (U) CPT Leo Merck, Commander, 870th MP Company
- Court-Martial Charges Preferred, for Conduct
Unbecoming an Officer and Unauthorized Use of Government Computer
in that he was alleged to have taken nude pictures of his female Soldiers
without their knowledge; Trial date to be announced.
7). (U) CPT Damaris Morales, Commander, 770th
MP Company
- GOMOR from BG Karpinski, Commander 800th MP
Brigade, on 20 August 2003, for failing to properly train his Soldiers
(Soldier had negligent discharge of M-16 while exiting his vehicle,
round went into fuel tank); filed locally.
8). (U) CSM Roy Clement, Command Sergeant Major,
800th MP Brigade
· GOMOR and Relief for Cause from BG Janis
Karpinski, Commander 800th MP Brigade, for fraternization and dereliction
of duty for fraternizing with junior enlisted soldiers within his unit;
GOMOR officially filed and he was removed from the CSM list.
9). (U) CSM Edward Stotts, Command Sergeant
Major, 400th MP Battalion
- GOMOR from BG Karpinski, Commander 800th MP
Brigade, on 20 August 2003, for failing to properly train his Soldiers
(Soldier had negligent discharge of M-16 while exiting his vehicle,
round went into fuel tank); filed locally.
10). (U) 1SG Carlos Villanueva, First Sergeant,
770th MP Company
- GOMOR from BG Karpinski, Commander 800th MP
Brigade, on 20 August 2003, for failing to properly train his Soldiers
(Soldier had negligent discharge of M-16 while exiting his vehicle,
round went into fuel tank); filed locally.
11). (U) MSG David Maffett, NBC NCO, 800th MP
Brigade,
- GOMOR from LTG McKiernan, Commander CFLCC,
on 25 May 2003, for violation of CENTCOM General Order #1, consuming
alcohol; filed locally.
12) (U) SGM Marc Emerson, Operations SGM, 320th
MP Battalion,
· Two GO Letters of Concern and a verbal
reprimand from BG Karpinski, Commander 800th MP Brigade, for failing
to adhere to the guidance/directives given to him by BG Karpinski; filed
locally.
d. (U) Saluting of officers was sporadic and
not enforced. LTC Robert P. Walters, Jr., Commander of the 165th Military
Intelligence Battalion (Tactical Exploitation), testified that the saluting
policy was enforced by COL Pappas for all MI personnel, and that BG
Karpinski approached COL Pappas to reverse the saluting policy back
to a no-saluting policy as previously existed. (ANNEX 53)
19. (U) I find that individual Soldiers within
the 800th MP Brigade and the 320th Battalion stationed throughout Iraq
had very little contact during their tour of duty with either LTC (P)
Phillabaum or BG Karpinski. BG Karpinski claimed, during her testimony,
that she paid regular visits to the various detention facilities where
her Soldiers were stationed. However, the detailed calendar provided
by her Aide-de-Camp, 1LT Mabry, does not support her contention. Moreover,
numerous witnesses stated that they rarely saw BG Karpinski or LTC (P)
Phillabaum. (Multiple Witness Statements)
20. (U) In addition I find that psychological
factors, such as the difference in culture, the Soldiers’ quality of
life, the real presence of mortal danger over an extended time period,
and the failure of commanders to recognize these pressures contributed
to the perversive atmosphere that existed at Abu Ghraib (BCCF) Detention
Facility and throughout the 800th MP Brigade. (ANNEX 1).
21. As I have documented in other parts of this
investigation, I find that there was no clear emphasis by BG Karpinski
to ensure that the 800th MP Brigade Staff, Commanders, and Soldiers
were trained to standard in detainee operations and proficiency or that
serious accountability lapses that occurred over a significant period
of time, particularly at Abu Ghraib (BCCF), were corrected. AR 15-6
Investigations regarding detainee escapes were not acted upon, followed
up with corrective action, or disseminated to subordinate commanders
or Soldiers. Brigade and unit SOPs for dealing with detainees if they
existed at all, were not read or understood by MP Soldiers assigned
the difficult mission of detainee operations. Following the abuse of
several detainees at Camp Bucca in May 2003, I could find no evidence
that BG Karpinski ever directed corrective training for her soldiers
or ensured that MP Soldiers throughout Iraq clearly understood the requirements
of the Geneva Conventions relating to the treatment of detainees. (Multiple
Witness Statements and the Personal Observations of the Investigation
Team )
22. On 17 January 2004 BG Karpinski was formally
admonished in writing by LTG Sanchez regarding the serious deficiencies
in her Brigade. LTG Sanchez found that the performance of the 800th
MP Brigade had not met the standards set by the Army or by CJTF-7.
He found that incidents in the preceding six months had occurred that
reflected a lack of clear standards, proficiency and leadership within
the Brigade. LTG Sanchez also cited the recent detainee abuse at Abu
Ghraib (BCCF) as the most recent example of a poor leadership climate
that “permeates the Brigade.” I totally concur with LTG Sanchez’ opinion
regarding the performance of BG Karpinski and the 800th MP Brigade.
(ANNEX 102 and the Personal Observations of the Investigating
Officer)
RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO PART THREE OF
THE INVESTIGATION:
1. (U) That BG Janis L. Karpinski,
Commander, 800th MP Brigade be Relieved from Command and
given a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand for the following acts
which have been previously referred to in the aforementioned findings:
- Failing to ensure that MP Soldiers at theater-level
detention facilities throughout Iraq had appropriate SOPs for dealing
with detainees and that Commanders and Soldiers had read, understood,
and would adhere to these SOPs.
- Failing to ensure that MP Soldiers in the
800th MP Brigade knew, understood, and adhered to the protections
afforded to detainees in the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment
of Prisoners of War.
- Making material misrepresentations to the
Investigation Team as to the frequency of her visits to her subordinate
commands.
- Failing to obey an order from the CFLCC Commander,
LTG McKiernan, regarding the withholding of disciplinary authority
for Officer and Senior Noncommissioned Officer misconduct.
- Failing to take appropriate action regarding
the ineffectiveness of a subordinate Commander, LTC (P) Jerry Phillabaum.
- Failing to take appropriate action regarding
the ineffectiveness of numerous members of her Brigade Staff including
her XO, S-1, S-3, and S-4.
- Failing to properly ensure the results and
recommendations of the AARs and numerous 15-6 Investigation reports
on escapes and shootings (over a period of several months) were properly
disseminated to, and understood by, subordinate commanders.
- Failing to ensure and enforce basic Soldier
standards throughout her command.
- Failing to establish a Brigade METL.
- Failing to establish basic proficiency in
assigned tasks for Soldiers throughout the 800th MP Brigade.
- Failing to ensure that numerous and reported
accountability lapses at detention facilities throughout Iraq were
corrected.
2. (U) That COL Thomas M. Pappas,
Commander, 205th MI Brigade, be given a General Officer
Memorandum of Reprimand and Investigated UP Procedure 15, AR 381-10,
US Army Intelligence Activities for the following acts which have been
previously referred to in the aforementioned findings:
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers under his
direct command were properly trained in and followed the IROE.
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers under his
direct command knew, understood, and followed the protections afforded
to detainees in the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of
Prisoners of War.
- Failing to properly supervise his soldiers
working and “visiting” Tier 1 of the Hard-Site at Abu Ghraib (BCCF).
3. (U) That LTC (P) Jerry L. Phillabaum,
Commander, 320th MP Battalion, be Relieved from Command,
be given a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, and be removed from
the Colonel/O-6 Promotion List for the following acts which have been
previously referred to in the aforementioned findings:
- Failing to properly ensure the results, recommendations,
and AARs from numerous reports on escapes and shootings over a period
of several months were properly disseminated to, and understood by,
subordinates.
- Failing to implement the appropriate recommendations
from various 15-6 Investigations as specifically directed by BG Karpinski.
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers under his
direct command were properly trained in Internment and Resettlement
Operations.
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers under his
direct command knew and understood the protections afforded to detainees
in the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of
War.
- Failing to properly supervise his soldiers
working and “visiting” Tier 1 of the Hard-Site at Abu Ghraib (BCCF).
- Failing to properly establish and enforce
basic soldier standards, proficiency, and accountability.
- Failure to conduct an appropriate Mission
Analysis and to task organize to accomplish his mission.
4. (U) That LTC Steven L. Jordan,
Former Director, Joint Interrogation and Debriefing Center and Liaison
Officer to 205th Military Intelligence Brigade, be relieved
from duty and be given a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand for
the following acts which have been previously referred to in the aforementioned
findings:
- Making material misrepresentations to the
Investigating Team, including his leadership roll at Abu Ghraib (BCCF).
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers under his
direct control were properly trained in and followed the IROE.
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers under his
direct control knew, understood, and followed the protections afforded
to detainees in the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of
Prisoners of War.
- Failing to properly supervise soldiers under
his direct authority working and “visiting” Tier 1 of the Hard-Site
at Abu Ghraib (BCCF).
5. (U) That MAJ David W. DiNenna,
Sr., S-3, 320th MP Battalion, be Relieved from his position
as the Battalion S-3 and be given a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand
for the following acts which have been previously referred to in the
aforementioned findings:
- Received a GOMOR from LTG McKiernan, Commander
CFLCC, on 25 May 2003, for dereliction of duty for failing to report
a violation of CENTCOM General Order #1 by a subordinate Field Grade
Officer and Senior Noncommissioned Officer, which he personally observed;
GOMOR was returned to Soldier and not filed.
- Failing to take corrective action and implement
recommendations from various 15-6 investigations even after receiving
a GOMOR from BG Karpinski, Commander 800th MP Brigade, on 10 November
03, for failing to take corrective security measures as ordered; GOMOR
was filed locally.
- Failing to take appropriate action and report
an incident of detainee abuse, whereby he personally witnessed a Soldier
throw a detainee from the back of a truck.
6. (U) That CPT Donald J. Reese,
Commander, 372nd MP Company, be Relieved from Command and
be given a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand for the following
acts which have been previously referred to in the aforementioned findings:
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers under his
direct command knew and understood the protections afforded to detainees
in the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of
War.
- Failing to properly supervise his Soldiers
working and “visiting” Tier 1 of the Hard-Site at Abu Ghraib (BCCF).
- Failing to properly establish and enforce
basic soldier standards, proficiency, and accountability.
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers under his
direct command were properly trained in Internment and Resettlement
Operations.
7. (U) That 1LT Lewis C. Raeder,
Platoon Leader, 372nd MP Company, be Relieved from his
duties as Platoon Leader and be given a General Officer Memorandum of
Reprimand for the following acts which have been previously referred
to in the aforementioned findings:
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers under his
direct command knew and understood the protections afforded to detainees
in the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of
War.
- Failing to properly supervise his soldiers
working and “visiting” Tier 1 of the Hard-Site at Abu Ghraib (BCCF).
- Failing to properly establish and enforce
basic Soldier standards, proficiency, and accountability.
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers under his
direct command were properly trained in Internment and Resettlement
Operations.
8. (U) That SGM Marc Emerson, Operations
SGM, 320th MP Battalion, be Relieved from his duties and
given a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand for the following acts
which have been previously referred to in the aforementioned findings:
- Making a material misrepresentation to the
Investigation Team stating that he had “never” been admonished or
reprimanded by BG Karpinski, when in fact he had been admonished for
failing to obey an order from BG Karpinski to “stay out of the towers”
at the holding facility.
- Making a material misrepresentation to the
Investigation Team stating that he had attended every shift change/guard-mount
conducted at the 320th MP Battalion, and that he personally briefed
his Soldiers on the proper treatment of detainees, when in fact numerous
statements contradict this assertion.
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers in the 320th
MP Battalion knew and understood the protections afforded to detainees
in the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of
War.
- Failing to properly supervise his soldiers
working and “visiting” Tier 1 of the Hard-Site at Abu Ghraib (BCCF).
- Failing to properly establish and enforce
basic soldier standards, proficiency, and accountability.
- Failing to ensure that his Soldiers were properly
trained in Internment and Resettlement Operations.
9. (U) That 1SG Brian G. Lipinski,
First Sergeant, 372nd MP Company, be Relieved from his
duties as First Sergeant of the 372nd MP Company and given a General
Officer Memorandum of Reprimand for the following acts which have been
previously referred to in the aforementioned findings:
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers in the 372nd
MP Company knew and understood the protections afforded to detainees
in the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of
War.
- Failing to properly supervise his soldiers
working and “visiting” Tier 1 of the Hard-Site at Abu Ghraib (BCCF).
- Failing to properly establish and enforce
basic soldier standards, proficiency, and accountability.
- Failing to ensure that his Soldiers were properly
trained in Internment and Resettlement Operations.
10. (U) That SFC Shannon K. Snider,
Platoon Sergeant, 372nd MP Company,
be Relieved from his duties, receive a General Officer Memorandum of
Reprimand, and receive action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice
for the following acts which have been previously referred to in the
aforementioned findings:
- Failing to ensure that Soldiers in his platoon
knew and understood the protections afforded to detainees in the Geneva
Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War.
- Failing to properly supervise his soldiers
working and “visiting” Tier 1 of the Hard-Site at Abu Ghraib (BCCF).
- Failing to properly establish and enforce
basic soldier standards, proficiency, and accountability.
- Failing to ensure that his Soldiers were properly
trained in Internment and Resettlement Operations.
- Failing to report a Soldier, who under his
direct control, abused detainees by stomping on their bare hands and
feet in his presence.
11. (U) That Mr. Steven Stephanowicz,
Contract US Civilian Interrogator, CACI, 205th Military Intelligence
Brigade, be given an Official Reprimand to be placed in
his employment file, termination of employment, and generation of a
derogatory report to revoke his security clearance for the following
acts which have been previously referred to in the aforementioned findings:
- Made a false statement to the investigation
team regarding the locations of his interrogations, the activities
during his interrogations, and his knowledge of abuses.
- Allowed and/or instructed MPs, who were not
trained in interrogation techniques, to facilitate interrogations
by “setting conditions” which were neither authorized and in accordance
with applicable regulations/policy. He clearly knew his instructions
equated to physical abuse.
12. (U) That Mr. John Israel,Contract
US Civilian Interpreter, CACI, 205th Military Intelligence Brigade,
be given an Official Reprimand to be placed in his employment
file and have his security clearance reviewed by competent authority
for the following acts or concerns which have been previously referred
to in the aforementioned findings:
- Denied ever having seen interrogation processes
in violation of the IROE, which is contrary to several witness statements.
- Did not have a security clearance.
13. (U) I find that there is sufficient credible
information to warrant an Inquiry UP Procedure 15, AR 381-10, US Army
Intelligence Activities, be conducted to determine the extent of culpability
of MI personnel, assigned to the 205th MI Brigade and the Joint Interrogation
and Debriefing Center (JIDC) at Abu Ghraib (BCCF). Specifically, I
suspect that COL Thomas M. Pappas, LTC Steve L. Jordan, Mr.
Steven Stephanowicz, and Mr. John Israel
were either directly or indirectly responsible for the abuses at Abu
Ghraib (BCCF) and strongly recommend immediate disciplinary action as
described in the preceding paragraphs as well as the initiation of a
Procedure 15 Inquiry to determine the full extent of their culpability.
(Annex 36)
OTHER FINDINGS/OBSERVATIONS
1. (U) Due to the nature and scope of this investigation,
I acquired the assistance of Col (Dr.) Henry Nelson, a USAF Psychiatrist,
to analyze the investigation materials from a psychological perspective.
He determined that there was evidence that the horrific abuses suffered
by the detainees at Abu Ghraib (BCCF) were wanton acts of select soldiers
in an unsupervised and dangerous setting. There was a complex interplay
of many psychological factors and command insufficiencies. A more detailed
analysis is contained in ANNEX 1 of this investigation.
2. (U) During the course of this investigation
I conducted a lengthy interview with BG Karpinski that lasted over four
hours, and is included verbatim in the investigation Annexes. BG Karpinski
was extremely emotional during much of her testimony. What I found
particularly disturbing in her testimony was her complete unwillingness
to either understand or accept that many of the problems inherent in
the 800th MP Brigade were caused or exacerbated by poor leadership and
the refusal of her command to both establish and enforce basic standards
and principles among its Soldiers. (ANNEX 45)
3. (U) Throughout the investigation, we observed
many individual Soldiers and some subordinate units under the 800th
MP Brigade that overcame significant obstacles, persevered in extremely
poor conditions, and upheld the Army Values. We discovered numerous
examples of Soldiers and Sailors taking the initiative in the absence
of leadership and accomplishing their assigned tasks.
a. (U) The 744th MP Battalion, commanded by
LTC Dennis McGlone, efficiently operated the HVD Detention Facility
at Camp Cropper and met mission requirements with little to no guidance
from the 800th MP Brigade. The unit was disciplined, proficient, and
appeared to understand their basic tasks.
b. (U) The 530th MP Battalion, commanded by
LTC Stephen J. Novotny, effectively maintained the MEK Detention Facility
at Camp Ashraf. His Soldiers were proficient in their individual tasks
and adapted well to this highly unique and non-doctrinal operation.
c. (U) The 165th MI Battalion excelled in providing
perimeter security and force protection at Abu Ghraib (BCCF). LTC Robert
P. Walters, Jr., demanded standards be enforced and worked endlessly
to improve discipline throughout the FOB.
4. (U) The individual Soldiers and Sailors that
we observed and believe should be favorably noted include:
a. (U) Master-at-Arms First Class William J.
Kimbro, US Navy Dog Handler, knew his duties and refused to participate
in improper interrogations despite significant pressure from the MI
personnel at Abu Ghraib.
b. (U) SPC Joseph M. Darby, 372nd MP Company
discovered evidence of abuse and turned it over to military law enforcement.
c. (U) 1LT David O. Sutton, 229th MP Company,
took immediate action and stopped an abuse, then reported the incident
to the chain of command.
CONCLUSION
1. (U) Several US Army Soldiers have committed
egregious acts and grave breaches of international law at Abu Ghraib/BCCF
and Camp Bucca, Iraq. Furthermore, key senior leaders in both the 800th
MP Brigade and the 205th MI Brigade failed to comply with established
regulations, policies, and command directives in preventing detainee
abuses at Abu Ghraib (BCCF) and at Camp Bucca during the period August
2003 to February 2004.
2. (U) Approval and implementation of the
recommendations of this AR 15-6 Investigation and those highlighted
in previous assessments are essential to establish the conditions with
the resources and personnel required to prevent future occurrences of
detainee abuse.
Annexes
Psychological AssessmentRequest for investigation
from CJTF-7 to CENTCOMDirective to CFLCC from CENTCOM directing investigationAppointment
Memo from CFLCC CDR to MG Taguba15-6 Investigation 9 June 200315-6 Investigation
12 June 200315-6 Investigation 13 June 200315-6 Investigation 24 November
200315-6 Investigation 7 January 2004 15-6 Investigation 12 January
2004 SIR 5 November 2003 SIR 7 November 2003SIR 8 November 2003SIR 13
December 2003SIR 13 December 2003SIR 13 December 2003SIR 17 December
2003Commander’s Inquiry 26 January 2004MG Ryder’s Report, 6 November
2003MG Miller’s Report, 9 September 2003AR 190-8, Enemy Prisoners of
War, Retained Personnel, Civilian Internees, and Other Detainees, 1
October 1997FM 3-19.40, Military Police Internment/Resettlement Operations,
1 August 2001FM 34-52, Intelligence Interrogation, 28 September 1992Fourth
Geneva Convention, 12 August 1949CID Report on criminal abuses at Abu
Ghraib, 28 January 2004CID Interviews, 10-25 January 2004800th MP Brigade
Roster, 29 January 2004205th MI Brigade’s IROE, UndatedTOA Order (800th
MP Brigade) and letter holding witnessesInvestigation Team’s witness
listFRAGO #1108Letters suspending several key leaders in the 800th MP
Brigade and Rating Chain with suspensions annotated FM 27-10, Military
Justice, 6 September 2002CID Report on abuse of detainees at Camp Bucca,
8 June 2003Article 32 Findings on abuse of detainees at Camp Bucca,
26 August 2003AR 381-10, 1 July 1984Excerpts from log books, 320th MP
Battalion310th MP Battalion’s Inprocessing SOP320th MP Battalion’s “Change
Sheet”Joint Interrogation and Debriefing Center’s (JIDC) Slides, UndatedOrder
of Battle Slides, 12 January 2004Joint Publication 0-2, Unified Actions
Armed Forces, 10 July 2001General Officer Memorandums of Reprimand800th
MP Battalion’s TACSOPBG Janis Karpinski, Commander, 800th MP Brigade
46. COL Thomas Pappas, Commander, 205th MI Brigade
47. COL Ralph Sabatino, CFLCC Judge Advocate,
CPA Ministry of Justice
48. LTC Gary W. Maddocks, S-5 and Executive
Officer, 800th MP Brigade
49. LTC James O’Hare, Command Judge Advocate,
800th MP Brigade
50. LTC Robert P. Walters Jr., Commander, 165th
MI Battalion (Tactical exploitation)
51. LTC James D. Edwards, Commander, 202nd MI
Battalion
52. LTC Vincent Montera, Commander 310th MP
Battalion
53. LTC Steve Jordan, former Director, Joint
Interrogation and Debriefing Center/LNO to the 205th MI Brigade
54. LTC Leigh A. Coulter, Commander 724th MP
Battalion and OIC Arifjan Detachment, 800th MP Brigade
55. LTC Dennis McGlone, Commander, 744th MP
Battalion
56. MAJ David Hinzman, S-1, 800th MP Brigade
57. MAJ William D. Proietto, Deputy CJA, 800th
MP Brigade
58. MAJ Stacy L. Garrity, S-1 (FWD), 800th MP
Brigade
59. MAJ David W. DiNenna, S-3, 320th MP Battalion
60. MAJ Michael Sheridan, XO, 320th MP Battalion
61. MAJ Anthony Cavallaro, S-3, 800th MP Brigade
62. CPT Marc C. Hale, Commander, 670th MP Company
63. CPT Donald Reese, Commander, 372nd MP Company
64. CPT Darren Hampton, Assistant S-3, 320th
MP Battalion
65. CPT John Kaires, S-3, 310th MP Battalion
66. CPT Ed Diamantis, S-2, 800th MP Brigade
67. LTC Jerry L. Phillabaum, Commander, 320th
MP Battalion
68. CPT James G. Jones, Commander, 229th MP
Company
69. CPT Michael A. Mastrangelo, Jr., Commander,
310th MP Company
70. CPT Lawrence Bush, IG, 800th MP Brigade
71. 1LT Lewis C. Raeder, Platoon Leader, 372nd
MP Company
72. 1LT Elvis Mabry, Aide-de-Camp to Brigade
Commander, 800th MP Brigade
73. 1LT Warren E. Ford, II, Commander, HHC 320th
MP Battalion
74. 2LT David O. Sutton, Platoon Leader, 229th
MP Company
75. CW2 Edward J. Rivas, 205th MI Brigade
76. CSM Joseph P. Arrison, Command Sergeant
Major, 320th MP Battalion
77. SGM Pascual Cartagena, Command Sergeant
Major, 800th MP Brigade
78. CSM Timothy L. Woodcock, Command Sergeant
Major, 310th MP Battalion
79. 1SG Dawn J. Rippelmeyer, First Sergeant,
977th MP Company
80. SGM Mark Emerson, Operations SGM, 320th
MP Battalion
81. MSG Brian G. Lipinski, First Sergeant, 372nd
MP Company
82. MSG Andrew J. Lombardo, Operations Sergeant,
310th MP Battalion
83. SFC Daryl J. Plude, Platoon Sergeant, 229th
MP Company
84. SFC Shannon K. Snider, Platoon SGT, 372nd
MP Company
85. SFC Keith A. Comer, 372nd MP Company
86. SSG Robert Elliot, Squad Leader, 372nd MP
Company
87. SSG Santos A. Cardona, Army Dog Handler
88. SGT Michael Smith, Army Dog Handler
89. MA1 William J. Kimbro, USN Dog Handler
90. Mr. Steve Stephanowicz, US civilian contract
Interrogator, CACI, 205th MI Brigade
91. Mr. John Israel, US civilian contract Interpreter,
Titan Corporation, 205th MI Brigade
92. FM 3-19.1, Military Police Operations, 22
March 2001
93. CJTF-7 IROE and DROE, Undated
94. CJTF-7 Interrogation and Counter Resistance
Policy, 12 October 2003
95. 800th MP Brigade Mobilization Orders
96. Sample Detainee Status Report, 13 March
2004
97. 530th MP Battalion Mission Brief, 11 February
2004
98. Memorandum for Record, CPT Ed Ray, Chief
of Military Justice, CFLCC, 9 March 2004
99. SIR 14 January 2004
100. Accountability Plan Recommendations, 9
March 2004
101. 2LT Michael R. Osterhout, S-2, 320th MP
Battalion
102. Memorandum of Admonishment from LTG Sanchez
to BG Karpinski, 17
January 2004
103. Various SIRs from the 800th MP Brigade/320th
MP Battalion
104. 205th MI Brigade SITREP to MG Miller, 12
December 2003
105. SGT William A. Cathcart, 372nd MP Company
106. 1LT Michael A. Drayton, Commander, 870th
MP Company