================= Other Abuse Cases ================= (Cases other than Abu Ghraib...) BAGRAM AFB * Capt. Carolyn A. Wood "As of [May 27, 2005], the Army has made no move to prefer criminal charges[.]" * Spc. Brian E. Cammack 3 months, reduction to E1, fine, bad-conduct discharge. * Spc. Glendale C. Walls II charged with assault, prisoner maltreatment, and lying to investigators. * Spc. Joshua Claus charged with assault, prisoner maltreatment, and lying to investigators. * Spc. Willie V. Brand. "[Brand has] been charged with assault and other crimes[.]" * Lt. Gen. Daniel K. McNeill, commander of allied forces in Afghanistan. * Spc. Anthony M. Morden * Spc. Robert S. Melone * Sgt. James P. Boland * Spc. Corey E. Jones * Sgt. Selena Salcido OTHER CASES * David Passaro (CIA contractor) Under indictment by DOJ. * [At] least 16 U.S. military personnel have been charged with murder as a result of field operations in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001. The following list does not include soldiers charged in connection with the deaths of prisoners. * 2nd Lt. Ilario Pantano (USMC) On trial for murder at Camp LeJeune. * A Marine spokesman said Tuesday that one other Marine was charged with murder during Operation Iraqi Freedom, but the charge was dismissed after an Article 32 hearing. * Army spokeswoman Lt. Col. Pamela Hart said Tuesday that 15 Army soldiers have been charged with murder during the Iraq conflict. Of those, she said, eight have gone to trial. Some of the Army cases include: * Staff Sgt. Johnny Horne pleaded guilty in December to killing a severely wounded 16-year-old Iraqi male during fighting in Baghdad's impoverished Sadr City neighborhood. * Staff Sgt. Cardenas J. Alban was convicted in January in the same killing. * Capt. Rogelio "Roger" Maynulet was convicted in March of assault with intent to commit voluntary manslaughter in the shooting death of a wounded Iraqi. * Pvt. Federico Daniel Merida of the North Carolina National Guard pleaded guilty in September to killing a 17-year-old Iraqi soldier after the two had consensual sex in a guard tower. * Sgt. 1st Class Tracy Perkins was acquitted in January of involuntary manslaughter in the alleged drowning of an Iraqi civilian, but was convicted of assault for forcing the man and his cousin into the Tigris River for violating curfew. * 1st Lt. Jack Saville pleaded guilty in March to assault and other crimes in the same incident. * Staff Sgt. Shane Werst has a pending court-martial on charges that he murdered an Iraqi civilian during a search for suspected insurgents. * Cpl. Dustin Berg of the Indiana National Guard faces a court-martial on a charge that he murdered an Iraqi police officer. * Spc. Brent May [Charged with] premeditated murder and lesser counts in a killing in Sadr City, Baghdad. A court-martial is pending. * Sgt. Michael P. Williams [Charged with] premeditated murder and lesser counts in a killing in Sadr City, Baghdad. A court-martial is pending. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Raleigh-Durham News & Observer -- Apr 27, 2005 TESTIMONY BY SOLDIERS BEGINS IN DEATHS OF TWO IRAQIS By Jay Price http://newsobserver.com/news/story/2350625p-8728466c.html CAMP LEJEUNE -- Minutes after shooting two Iraqis, 2nd Lt. Ilario G. Pantano bragged about leaving a sign over their bodies bearing the Marine slogan "No Better Friend, No Worse Enemy," according to a witness in a hearing to determine whether Pantano is court-martialed on charges of premeditated murder. The sign was "like a death card," said Lt. Samuel Cunningham, a platoon leader whose unit was guarding a bridge about 1,000 yards from the killing site that day, April 15, 2004. "I told him it was inappropriate, and he should go back and get it." Pantano, 33, a former film executive from New York, has been charged with two counts of premeditated murder in the deaths of the men, whom his unit stopped during a cordon-and-search operation in Mahmudiyah. According to written charges, Pantano ordered another Marine and a sailor to remove the handcuffs from Tahab Ahmead Hanjil and Hamaady Kareem, then told other servicemen to look away and shot the two Iraqis in the back with an M-16 assault rifle. Cunningham testified Tuesday that he heard 45 to 50 shots. They came so quickly and smoothly, Cunningham said, he thought someone was firing a machine gun. About 30 minutes later, Pantano walked up and told him about the dead Iraqis and the sign. Pantano left the bodies on display as a message to locals and vandalized Hanjil's vehicle by slashing the tires and smashing the headlights, taillights and a rear window, according to the charge sheet. If convicted, Pantano could face the death penalty. His attorneys, who do not dispute that Pantano shot the Iraqis, have said that he had their cuffs removed so that the men could search their own vehicle, in order to protect Marines from booby traps. Pantano fired in self-defense when the two men moved toward him, his lawyers say. The Pantano case is one of several prosecutions in North Carolina related to the war that have garnered national attention. As his case proceeds, an Army jury at Fort Bragg is deciding whether Sgt. Hasan Akbar will die for killing two officers and wounding 14 other military personnel in a sneak attack on comrades in Kuwait. David Passaro, a former CIA contractor from Lillington, faces trial in Raleigh's federal court on charges that he beat an Afghan detainee who later died. And, before her case was moved to Texas, Pfc. Lynndie England faced criminal proceedings at Fort Bragg in the wake of the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal. But the idea of a Marine's facing execution for killing suspected insurgents in a war zone has created an outcry. U.S. Rep. Walter Jones Jr., a Farmville Republican, has tried to get the House of Representatives and President Bush to intervene. Pantano's mother is operating a Web site to build support for him and raise money. The Washington Times and the Fox network's national news have written and broadcast stories about Pantano, but neither appeared to cover the evidentiary hearing, which continues today. At the Article 32 hearing, the military equivalent of a grand jury proceeding, a Marine translator said that before the killings, the two suspects were interrogated separately, and both gave the same story: that they were visiting family at the house where they were detained. Other Iraqis inside, he said, told him the men were indeed relatives. Identified only as "Cpl. O," because of his counterintelligence work, the Marine said a search of the house turned up little more than an AK-47, which Iraqi families commonly keep for self-defense. He said he didn't know of any weapons or bomb-making material found in the vehicle. He also said that the men appeared to have been shot in the back. Charles Gittens, Pantano's lead civilian attorney, said after the hearing that Cpl. O hadn't been involved in the search of the vehicle and that he was mistaken, that more weapons were found. Asked why Pantano had to fire so many times -- he would have had to change magazines because they hold only 30 rounds each -- Gittens said he didn't want to second-guess someone whose life was in danger. "You want to make sure the guy who's trying to kill you is the one who dies," he said. On Tuesday, Pantano's defense lawyers were aggressive, objecting 19 times to issues ranging from the clothes dictated for the hearing (green camouflage rather than a dress uniform) to testimony that they said was not given under oath. In most cases, the investigating officer, Maj. Mark E. Winn, simply said the objection would be noted. The defense did win a couple, though, including a ban on prosecutors' use of the word "victims" to describe the dead Iraqis. Gittens said that if the killings were justified, the dead men obviously were not victims. Winn, whose role is similar to that of a judge, also agreed to produce a list of material the defense said it had been requesting for weeks. The defense also challenged the fitness of Winn himself after a series of questions to him about whether he had said during a Saturday conversation at an Emerald Isle bar that he wanted nothing to do with the case and had called Gittens an unpleasant name. Winn said he had a brief conversation about the case but didn't call Gittens a name or say he didn't want to be involved with the case. The hearing Tuesday was to gather information to help the commanding general of the 2nd Marine Division, Maj. Gen. Richard Huck, decide whether Pantano should face a court-martial. The hearing is expected to last several days. Winn could then take weeks or longer to sift the evidence and make his recommendation to Huck. Pantano had waived his right to the hearing, essentially telling the government to go ahead with the court-martial. It was an unusual move, and even rarer was the government's response: It decided to hold the hearing anyway. Pantano has an unorthodox background for a Marine officer. He was raised in a rough part of New York City but won a scholarship to a fancy prep school. After high school, he joined the Marines and served in the 1991 Persian Gulf War but later left the service. Eventually he landed a job with six-figure salary at a production company that produced such films as "Sling Blade." After the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, though, he joined the Marines again. [ Staff writer Jay Price can be reached at jprice@newsobserver.com ] * Human Rights Watch -- April 2005 GETTING AWAY WITH TORTURE? COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE U.S. ABUSE OF DETAINEES http://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/us0405/ "Prosecuting Some Soldiers, Belatedly" ch. 3, sec. 2: http://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/us0405/5.htm#_Toc101408095 "Until the publication of the Abu Ghraib photographs forced action, almost all military investigations into deaths and mistreatment in custody were languishing. No one implicated in the abuse of persons in custody in Afghanistan, Iraq or elsewhere, including in the killing of detainees, had been criminally prosecuted. Many personnel appear to have had their cases shelved or have been given inappropriate administrative reprimands, instead of facing criminal prosecution. "In the aftermath of the Abu Ghraib pictures, the United States initiated the prosecution of a number of soldiers and contactors for alleged crimes committed in Iraq (particularly Abu Ghraib)75 and Afghanistan. Pentagon officials told Human Rights Watch in March 2005 that out of 300 investigations initiated into abuse allegations, only 14 persons have been convicted by court-martial. And although 33 additional soldiers have been referred to trial by court-martial, 70 have received only "non-judicial punishments," such as reprimands, rank reductions, or discharge from the military, though many of the alleged abuse cases involved serious abuses and homicides.76 Earlier, in December 2004, the Pentagon told journalists that 130 American troops had been punished or charged for abuse of prisoners, a figure which apparently includes non-judicial punishments.77 "Homicide investigations have been extremely slow. As of February 2005, Army criminal investigators were reported to have conducted 68 detainee death investigations with 79 possible victims.78 Yet only two homicide cases have resulted in recommended courts martial for homicide; one has been postponed and in another, most of the implicated personnel were brought before non-judicial administrative hearings instead of court-martial, and most received only administrative punishments. Many cases involving detainee deaths in Afghanistan in 2002, over two-and-a-half years ago, have gone unresolved. In one case from Afghanistan, it appears that an army captain who "murdered" a detainee was simply discharged from the military, and his case was closed.79 "Meanwhile, no criminal investigations appear to have been commenced for abuses committed at Guantanamo Bay, at US-run "secret locations" around the world or in connection with the rendition of persons to third countries where they were likely to be tortured. With respect to CIA abuses, Porter J. Goss, who replaced George Tenet as director of Central Intelligence, told the Senate Intelligence Committee in February 2005 that "a bunch of other cases" were now under review by the CIA’s inspector general. No CIA officers have been charged in relation to alleged mistreatment, with the single exception of a CIA contractor charged in the death of detainee in Afghanistan in 2003." * Pravda -- May 27, 2005 NO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR BAGRAM By J. David Galland http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/101/399/15548_bagram.html The U.S. Army staffed, operated, and condoned the sustained daily functions of a proverbial torture chamber at the Bagram Military Detention Center in Afghanistan in 2002. Now, 2½ years later, the officers responsible for that facility have yet to face the consequences for their leadership failures. The dark history of this interrogation and detention facility is mired in denial, gross command irresponsibility at all levels, and soldiers gone wild with rage. Combined, all factors resulted in the injury and in several cases, the death of detainees. During the course of interrogations, unlucky detainees were routinely abused by the assigned Military Intelligence interrogators from the 519th Military Intelligence Battalion from Fort Bragg, N.C. Augmenting the staff were Military Police soldiers from the Army Reserve's 377th MP Company from Cincinnati, Ohio. Regarded as potential sources of human intelligence information, detainees being held for interrogation were routinely kicked, beaten, hung by irons from immovable objects to include detention cell ceilings. Their humiliation was constant as a matter of policy. This policy was set by Army Capt. Carolyn A. Wood, an experienced Army interrogator then assigned to the 519th MI Battalion. Wood posted her own list of "interrogation rules of engagement" (ROE) at Bagram and later did the same when transferred to Abu Ghraib prison west of Baghdad. Wood's ROE were in effect until they were discovered to be inconsistent with interrogation rules published by the CJTF commander in Iraq, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez. Given the ghastly treatment that many detainees received at Abu Ghraib, some resulting in horrifying deaths, one may not be shocked with the revelations of abuse at the Bagram facility. Making the situation worse was the likelihood that a detainee in a field detention center may be completely innocent, and guilty of nothing more than being in the wrong place at the wrong time. This did not stop Army MI personnel, and MPs from exacting punishment on detained, injured, and shackled suSpcts that was no less than horrific. Such crimes, we now discover, were not rare. As reported by The New York Times last week, an Afghani named Habibullah was captured by an Afghan Warlord on Nov. 28, 2002. Two days later, he was delivered to the Bagram detention facility by CIA operatives who said that Habibullah was suSpcted of being a brother of a former Taliban commander from the southern Afghan province of Oruzgan. Maj. Bobby R. Atwell, a military police officer now assigned to the 16th MP Brigade at Fort Bragg, who was then serving as the provost marshal at Bagram, offered, in an interview with the NY Times, that Habibullah "had a piercing gaze and was very confident." Perhaps it was this perceived arrogance on the part of the detainee that led to his ultimate fate. When delivered to the Bagram facility, Habibullah was described as being in good health by the doctor who examined him. However, the senior intelligence operations chief at Bagram, Lt. Col. John W. Loffert Jr., later told Army investigators, "He was already in bad condition when he arrived." Since Loffert is not a doctor, the reader must assume one of two things: Either Habibullah had visible symptoms of poor health, or the officer lied. On his second day in the Bagram facility, interrogators declared Habibullah as being "uncooperative." According to MP Capt. Christopher M. Beiring, this following a day of being subject to the standard policy of "being hooded, shackled, and isolated for at least the first 24 hours." Soldiers who were assigned to the facility readily admitted, in classified investigative reports later released and published in the news media, that the guards kept prisoners awake by yelling or poking at them or banging on their cell doors. This went on while Habibullah was shackled by the wrists to the wire ceiling over his cell door. To which the question arises: Would you remain calm and cooperative at this juncture after a full day of this kind of welcome at a detention facility? When it came time for a rectal exam, and more heavy-handed treatment meted out by the guards, it is not surprising that Habibullah became violent. The detainee struck Sgt. Alan J. Driver Jr. - is a reserve MP from the 377th MP Co. - with a knee. That act probably sealed Habibullah's fate. Later that day, Spc. Willie V. Brand, a guard and not an interrogator with the 377th reported Habibullah as "uncooperative" and then saw fit to deliver a flurry of peroneal strikes in response. This involves kneeing the victim in the muscle group just above the victim"s knee. The next day, Brand found Habibullah uncooperative again, and assaulted the detainee a second time with more knee shots to the legs. As an MI soldier for more than 30 years, I can attest that nowhere in any Army Training Manual, Army Regulation, or Field Manual does the U.S. Army prescribe numerous and repeated peroneal strikes to the legs or a detainee - for any reason. It is interesting to note that Brand, a junior enlisted soldier, has been charged with assault and other crimes perpetrated against detainees. His civilian lawyer, John P. Galligan, is quick to point out that his client, Brand, was performing his duties consistently within the standard operating procedures that were in place at the Bagram facility. Given the widespread proliferation of catastrophic abuse directed at detainees, and numerous other corroborative facts, Galligan"s assertion has great credibility. The situation at Bagram continued to spiral out of control. By Dec. 3, 2002, Habibullah"s sustained defiance made him a open target for scores of peroneal strikes for being, again, "noncompliant." One M.P., not named in the N.Y. Times, stated that he gave Habibullah five peroneal strikes and another gave him three or four more, again, for being, "combative and noncompliant." The piece in the N.Y. Times revealed that some guards later asserted that he, Habibullah, had been hurt trying to escape. Some guards later asserted that he had been hurt trying to escape. How combative can a man be while shackled to the ceiling and chained to the floor by his feet and with a bag over his head? These were the conditions of Habibullah"s detention and restraint on Dec. 3, 2002, according to M.P. Sgt. James P. Boland. Later that date, Boland found Habibullah, slumped forward and held up by the chains attaching him to the ceiling. Sgt. Boland informed investigators of Habibullah"s condition. Boland returned and entered the cell with Spcialists Anthony M. Morden and Brian E. Cammack, both members of the 377th MP Company. Habibullah"s hood was removed and, according to Cammack, Habibullah then spat on him. After serving as a municipal police officer during 1972-80, I can attest that this is not an unusual event when dealing with detainees. I and most other police officers have been subjected to much worse. By his own admission, Cammack stated that, he "exploded" and yelled at Habibullah, "don"t ever spit on me again." Further, Cammack admitted that he began kneeing the shackled and swaying man in the thigh "maybe a couple" of times. Twenty minutes later, Habibullah was found dead in his cell by Sgt. Boland and Spc. Cammack. According to Boland, "Spc. Cammack appeared very distraught, the soldier was running about the room . hysterically." Immediately, another MP was dispatched to find a medic. When his assistance was requested by the MPs, Spc. Robert S. Melone, indignant at being bothered, reportedly said, "What are you getting me for? Call an ambulance instead!" Another medic was contacted, he responded, and found Habibullah on the floor, dead, his arms outstretched, eyes and mouth open wide. On Dec. 8, 2002, an autopsy performed on Habibullah revealed that his death was attributed to a blood clot that likely traveled to his heart and blocked the blood flow to his lungs. This clot was probably the result of the severe injuries to his legs, according to the autopsy findings. Significantly, the autopsy discovered bruises and abrasions on the victim"s chest, arms and head. Also present were deep contusions on his calves, knees and thighs. His left calf was marked by what appeared to have been the sole of a boot. The next victim arrived at Bagram on Dec. 5, 2002, only two days after Habibullah"s death. The Afghani, named Dilawar, had been detained on suspicion of firing rockets at a U.S. military site in Afghanistan. He was a taxi driver by profession. In keeping with Capt. Wood"s rules, both MI and MP escorts would render him a similar fate to that of Habibullah. Prison guards soon declared him "noncompliant," and his handling and incarceration were almost identical to that of the now deceased detainee Shackled in his cell, just prior to a scheduled interrogation, Dilawar reportedly spat on MP Spc. Corey E. Jones when the soldier brought him some water. Jones later asserted that as a result he began a series of knee and peroneal strikes to the detainee"s leg. In response to beating, Dilawar reportedly screamed out, "Allah, Allah, Allah." Other MP soldiers heard Dilawar screaming, and according to Jones" own admission, "They thought it was funny." Other MPs in the platoon showed up to give Dilawar repeated and sustained peroneal strikes over a 24-hour period. This was done just to hear Dilawar scream, "Allah," said Jones to CID Investigators. In a subsequent statement to CID, Spcialist Jones was vague about which M.P.'s had delivered the blows. His estimate was never confirmed, but other guards eventually admitted striking Mr. Dilawar repeatedly. On Dec. 8, 2002, the same day as Habibullah"s autopsy, Dilawar was subjected to his fourth interrogation with 21-year-old Spc. Glendale C. Walls II as the interrogator. Walls declared the detainee hostile because he would not admit to allegations that he had launched rockets at the American base. Dilawar was physically unable to hold his hand-cuffed hands above his head as instructed, which prompted another interrogator, Sgt. Selena Salcido, to forcibly slap Dilawar"s hands back up when they fell. Both interrogators then termed Dilawar evasive because he was unable to sit in a chair due to the injuries he had sustained at the hands of the guards during the past 24 hours. Dilawar was then repeatedly shoved against the wall by Walls and Salcido because he could no longer stand. According to an interpreter who was present, later identified as Ahmad Ahmadzai, Dilawar received a beating for about ten to fifteen minutes at the hands of Walls and Salcido. The thrashing was highlighted by the violent kicking of Dilawar in the groin, private areas, and one good drop kick, in which Salcido stepped back and advanced rapidly, kicking Dilawar. In published classified investigative reports, Salcido also stepped on Dilawar"s bare foot and pulled him about, physically, by his beard. Following this sustained attack and beating on Dilawar, which Ahmadzai described as no interrogation at all, Dilawar was returned to his cell and shackled to the ceiling until the next interrogation shift came on. Salcido instructed the MP escorts to shackle Dilawar to the ceiling in his cell. The next morning, Dec. 9, 2002, Dilawar was subjected to his final interrogation at which he was unable to kneel when ordered or physically comply with anything. This caused the interrogation session to erode to more physical abuse. An interrogator identified as Spc. Joshua Claus took over from Walls, who remained present. Dilawar"s last interrogation eroded into more abuse and assault and he was returned to his cell and re-shackled. Dilawar was found dead the next morning. Claus and Walls have both since been charged with assault, prisoner maltreatment, and lying to investigators. Shortly after Dilawar"s death Lt. Col. Elizabeth Rouse, the corner, who was a Major at the time, determined that Dilawar suffered injuries so extreme that one of his legs "had basically been pulpified." Rouse further commented regarding Dilawar"s fate and demise, "I"ve seen similar injuries in an individual run over by a bus." In February 2003, while making an effort deny the criminal actions of soldiers and leaders alike, Lt. Gen. Daniel K. McNeill, commander of allied forces in Afghanistan, released a statement that said, in part: "We are not chaining people to the ceilings .. I will say that our interrogation techniques are adapted, they are in accordance with what is generally accepted as interrogation techniques." As with the infamous guards at Abu Ghraib, one must ask, where was the supervision by the guards" chain of command? Who was in charge? Where were the officers and commanders during that month when two detainees were viciously beaten to death in a gruesome, painful and bizarre manner? Where was any level of senior noncommissioned officer leadership? Just who in hell was in operational charge of these Spcialists and junior NCOs? Who was setting policy and monitoring those policies? The answer is that Capt. Carolyn A. Wood, a vastly experienced U.S. Army intelligence officer. Wood, recall, was the officer in charge of interrogations and intelligence collection operations at Bagram in December 2002. Wood is currently assigned to duties as the adjutant of the 304th MI Battalion at Fort Huachuca, Ariz. A former enlisted soldier and former staff sergeant in the MI career field, Wood later became a commissioned officer. At Bagram, she wrote and posted her own "rules of interrogation" for detainees. In mid-2003, Wood was reassigned to Abu Ghraib prison with essentially the same duties. While there, she fell under the ineffective leadership of Lt. Col. Steven P. Jordan, of the 205th MI Brigade, which was responsible for detainee interrogations at the prison. Also, according to the N.Y. Times, in a piece written by Douglas Jehl and Eric Schmitt, which appeared on May 21, 2004, upon arriving at Abu Ghraib, Wood again posted her "interrogation rules and operational directives." Effectively, she had imported and applied many of the harsh methods that seemed to work for her unit at the Afghanistan site. The aftermath of the detainees" deaths at Bagram is sickeningly similar to that of the Abu Ghraib scandal: To date, only seven junior enlisted soldiers have been accused and or/punished for their involvement as part of Wood"s team in Afghanistan, although according published news reports, over 28 soldiers have been implicated in the two murders thus far. Spc. Cammack last week pleaded guilty at a court-martial at Fort Bliss, Tex., to assault and two counts of making a false statement relating to his assault on Habibullah. The military judge sentenced Cammack to three months in prison, reduced him to the rank of private, issued a fine, and gave him a bad-conduct discharge. As of this writing, the Army has made no move to prefer criminal charges against Capt. Wood, who - to no one"s surprise - was unavailable for comment. The illegal beating of detainees may be over, but the Army"s accountability scandal continues. * Footnotes from Human Rights First, BEHIND THE WIRE (March 2005): http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/PDF/behind-the-wire-033005.pdf 262 See Human Rights First, GETTING TO GROUND TRUTH (Sept. 2004), available at (accessed Jan. 19, 2005): http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/PDF/detainees/Getting_to_Ground_Truth_090804.pdf see also Steven Lee Myers and Eric Schmitt, Wide Gaps Seen in U.S. Inquiries on Prison Abuse, N.Y. TIMES, June 6, 2004, available at (accessed Jan. 21, 2005): http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/06/international/middleeast/06ABUS.html 265 Sgt James P. Boland, a military police reservist from the 377th MP Company, was charged Aug. 23 with Sgt. James P. Boland, a military police reservist from the 377th MP Company, was charged Aug. 23 with assault and dereliction of duty for the death of the two Afghan men in Bagram. Reservist Charged in Afghan Prison Abuse Case, MSNBC, Sept. 1, 2004, available at (accessed Jan. 21, 2005): http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5888743 David Passaro, an ex-CIA contractor has been charged for the death of Abdul Waili at a detention center in Asadabad in the Eastern District of Virginia. Curt Anderson, CIA Contractor Charged With Prisoner Abuse, ASSOC. PRESS., June 17, 2004, available at (accessed Jan. 20, 2005): http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49344-2004Jun17.html Elise Ackerman, 2 Reservists Face Punishmentsin Detainee's Deaths, KNIGHT RIDDER, Mar. 7, 2005, available at (ac- cessed Mar. 7, 2005): http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/news/nation/11074621.htm * MSNBC / AP -- November 12, 2004 NEW GUANTANAMO ABUSE CASES SURFACE Amnesty International calls for independent commission GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba (AP) - Two new cases of detainee abuse have surfaced at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp, including one in which a U.S. military commander failed to properly investigate a prison guard who threw cleaning solvent on a terror suSpct. The guard threw the solvent on the prisoner in January and was demoted and reassigned in June, a month after Navy InSpctor General Vice Adm. Albert T. Church visited the remote outpost to investigate claims of abuse. The guard’s commanding officer also was reprimanded, military officials said. Another incident involved a guard who hit a detainee in October after the man allegedly spat on the guard and tried to bite him. The guard was demoted and reassigned the same month. "We have a process in place to review all allegation reports. Each report that alleges mistreatment at Guantanamo is taken seriously," said Army Lt. Col. Leon Sumpter, a spokesman. HIGH-RANKING CASE The commander who mishandled the solvent incident was an Army captain and the highest known ranking officer to be disciplined in an abuse case at the outpost in eastern Cuba, Sumpter said. The company commander generally is in charge of more than 130 soldiers. After the scandal at the U.S.-run Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq -- where American soldiers were photographed abusing detainees -- military officials at the U.S. Southern Command in Miami told The Associated Press there were three substantiated abuse cases at Guantanamo. The military last week provided details of eight substantiated cases of abuse by personnel from prison guards to a barber. The information came nearly two months after the AP asked for details of cases described in an August report by James R. Schlesinger, who headed a U.S. congressional committee to investigate abuses in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo. Despite the previous request, the two new cases only surfaced Thursday. INFORMATION DRIBBLING OUT "This problem won’t be solved by dribbling out bits of information over a period of months. The U.S. government needs to stop hiding behind closed doors and create an independent commission to look into all charges of abuse," said Jumana Musa of Amnesty International, one of four observers who came to Guantanamo to observe motions hearings ahead of military commissions, or trials. Other abuse allegations have been reported by detainees appearing before review tribunals evaluating their status as enemy combatants. An Afghan man testified Wednesday the Taliban killed members of his family and imprisoned members continued attacks in Guantanamo by beating him, spitting on him and throwing urine on him. Abuse allegations are a core complaint in a habeas corpus petition filed Monday by attorneys for Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud al Qosi of Sudan, an alleged paymaster for al-Qaida and accused associate of Osama bin Laden who is one of four people charged with conspiracy. He alleges Guantanamo interrogators wrapped prisoners in an Israeli flag, showed them pornographic photos and forced them to be present while others had sex. Al Qosi’s lawyers did not say in which cases their client witnessed the abuse, who had sex in detainees’ presence or how many incidents were reported. ALLEGATION: 'HELL ROOM' Al Qosi’s petition in U.S. District Court in Washington is one of several challenges that could halt his trial, tentatively scheduled for Feb. 8. Al Qosi’s lawyers said in their petition -- one of more than 60 pending cases -- that interrogations often occurred in an area detainees called the "Hell Room," where pornographic pictures were displayed. They said methods included "taunting detainees in sexually humiliating ways, including having sex in detainees’ presence or having female interrogators rub their bodies suggestively against detainees." Cases in the congressional report included a female interrogator who climbed onto a detainee’s lap and ran her fingers through his hair, and another detainee whose knees were bruised from being forced to kneel repeatedly. The report followed Church’s visit in May, when he said he found conditions to be professional and humane but acknowledged that his visit was too short to investigate whether more abuses had occurred. Church cited eight "minor infractions." Four involved prison guards, three involved interrogators and one involved a barber, who it was later revealed gave detainees two reverse Mohawk-style haircuts. The perpetrators were demoted, reprimanded or sent for more training. * CBS News / AP -- November 5, 2004 US DETAILS 8 GITMO ABUSE CASES GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba (AP) - A detainee was forced to kneel so many times he was bruised, a barber gave reverse Mohawks and a female interrogator ran her fingers through a prisoner's hair and sat in his lap, the U.S. government says in the most detailed accounting of eight abuse cases at its Guantanamo Bay prison for terror suSpcts. Those responsible for the abuse have been demoted, reprimanded or sent for more training, according to an 800-word U.S. military response to a written query from The Associated Press. Allegations of mistreatment at Guantanamo, where 550 terror suSpcts have been held for nearly three years, surfaced after the abuse scandal broke last year at the U.S.-run Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, where pictures showed beatings and sexual humiliation of Iraqi prisoners. The details of abuse at Guantanamo come as lawyers for several prisoners challenge evidence presented by the government, saying some could have been obtained by force. Only four prisoners have been formally charged at Guantanamo, where most are held without charge or access to lawyers. The military has reported 34 suicide attempts among detainees, though none has been reported since January. Guantanamo's new commander says lessons have been learned from past abuses cases and troops are treating detainees humanely with a rigorous system of checks and balances. "They've not been mistreated, they've not been tortured in any reSpct," Army Brig. Gen. Jay Hood said in an interview Wednesday. Human rights monitors are not convinced. "We're confident that there's more information out there that hasn't been released," said Jameel Jaffer of the American Civil Liberties Union, which has obtained nearly 6,000 documents about procedures at U.S.-run prisons. He was in Guantanamo to observe pretrial hearings. Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, now in charge of U.S.-run prisons in Iraq, commanded the Guantanamo prison from November 2002 to March 2004 with a mandate to get better intelligence. Most abuses reported in August by James R. Schlesinger, who headed a U.S. Congressional committee to investigate abuses in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo, occurred under Miller's watch. The Department of Defense, responding to an AP query made nearly two months ago, this week provided details of the eight Guantanamo abuses cases Schlesinger cited. No names were given. In one case, a female interrogator took off her uniform top to expose her T- shirt to a detainee, ran her fingers through his hair and climbed on his lap in April 2003. A supervisor monitoring the session terminated it, and the woman was reprimanded and sent for more training, the military said. The same month, an interrogator told military police to repeatedly bring a detainee from a standing to kneeling position, so much that his knees were bruised, the government said. The interrogator got a written reprimand and Miller reportedly stopped use of that technique. Also that month, a guard was charged with dereliction of duty and assault after a detainee assaulted another guard. After the detainee was subdued, the guard punched the prisoner with his fist. He was demoted. In a separate case, a guard was charged with assault after he sprayed a detainee with a hose when the prisoner allegedly tried to throw water from his toilet at him in September 2002. The guard was reduced in rank and reassigned. Another female interrogator wiped dye from a red magic marker on a detainee's shirt, telling him it was blood, after he allegedly spat on her. She received a verbal reprimand in early 2003. In March 2003, a military policeman used pepper spray on a detainee allegedly preparing to throw unidentified liquid on an officer. The policeman was acquitted by a court martial. Incidents this year include a military policeman who squirted a detainee with water in February, and a camp barber who gave two "unusual haircuts." The haircuts were reverse Mohawks, according to a government official who spoke on condition of anonymity. The barber gave the cuts to frustrate detainee efforts to wear their hair the same way to demonstrate unity, the government said. The barber and his company were reprimanded. Air Force Lt. Col. Sharon Shaffer, defense attorney for a Guantanamo prisoner, announced Thursday that she would file a petition in federal court challenging her client's detention and alleging systematic abuse at the prison. She represents Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud al-Qosi of Sudan, an alleged al Qaeda paymaster whose conspiracy trial is scheduled for February. "The abuse allegations at Guantanamo are a matter of growing concern," Shaffer said. "He was constantly being told he would be sent to Egypt to be interrogated, where many of the detainees believed they would be killed. And he was forced to sit for hours in the freezing cold." At least one military insider at Guantanamo has gone public with allegations of abuse -- a military police officer who was injured after going undercover as a detainee. National Guardsman Sean Baker said the attack occurred in November 2002, the month after Miller arrived in Guantanamo, when he was told to put on an orange detainee jumpsuit, get in a cell and wait for an Initial Response Force -- the teams used to subdue misbehaving detainees. From under the bunk, Baker heard the extraction team come in, he said in his latest comments during a CBS television program aired Wednesday. "My face was down. And of course, they're pushing it down against the steel floor, you know, my right temple, pushing it down against the floor," Baker told CBS. The incident was purportedly recorded, one of some 500 hours of tapes that the military has refused to publicly release. Baker said he tried to tell his attackers he was a soldier but they repeatedly slammed his head against the floor. Baker was airlifted to a naval hospital in Virginia where doctors said he suffered a brain injury. He has been plagued by seizures since, he said. * CNN -- June 22, 2004 US INDICTS CIA CONTRACTOR IN AFGHANISTAN PRISON DEATH By Terry Frieden http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/06/17/afghan.indictment/ WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A contractor working for the CIA has been indicted on charges stemming from the death of a prisoner at a prison in Afghanistan, Justice Department officials said. It is the first time charges have been brought against a civilian since the reports of alleged prison abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan surfaced in the past few months. The four-count indictment says the contractor, David Passaro, 38, beat an Afghan prisoner identified as Abdul Wali, who had surrendered voluntarily at the front gate of a U.S. detention facility near Asadabad in the northeastern Kunar Province on June 18, 2003. The remote site, which had been under frequent rocket attack, is about five miles from the Pakistani border, where remnants of the Taliban and al Qaeda remain active. A federal grand jury in Raleigh, North Carolina, returned the indictment, which includes two counts of assault causing serious injury and two counts of assault with a deadly weapon. Each count carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine upon conviction. Federal law allows civilian charges to be brought against U.S. citizens for crimes overseas if they are not under military jurisdiction. After a brief court appearance Thursday, Passaro was ordered to remain in custody pending a detention hearing set for next Tuesday. Attorney General John Ashcroft said at a Thursday news conference that Wali was suspected of participating in the attacks on the Asadabad base and that Passaro's job was to assist military personnel detain prisoners at the base. While in custody, Wali was interrogated by Passaro about the rocket attacks, Ashcroft said. "During these interrogations on June 19 and June 20, it is alleged that Passaro beat Wali repeatedly using his hands and feet and a large flashlight," Ashcroft said, quoting from the indictment. "Abdul Wali died in a cell on Asadabad Base on June 21, 2003," the indictment says. Passaro, a former U.S. Army Ranger, had arrived at the base at the beginning of June, a U.S. official said. Ashcroft said the case would be fully investigated. "President Bush has made it clear that the U.S. will not tolerate criminal acts of brutality such as those alleged in this indictment," he said in a prepared statement. "The types of illegal abuse detailed run counter to our values and our policies and are not representative of our men and women in the military and associated personnel serving honorably and admirably for the cause of freedom." Passaro, of Lillington, North Carolina, was arrested Thursday morning at his workplace in Fayetteville. Officials said Passaro was to have an initial appearance Thursday afternoon at the federal courthouse in Raleigh. The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), a New York-based legal advocacy group, said it sent a letter to the Pentagon last year demanding an investigation into the death of Wali. The November 12 CCR letter also called for an investigation into the deaths of two Afghan detainees in U.S. custody at the Bagram military base in Afghanistan. The CIA inspector general has referred several cases to the Justice Department for investigation. A U.S. official said Thursday that Passaro had worked as a contractor for the CIA since December 2002. CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield issued a statement saying, "We take allegations of wrongdoing very seriously, and it is important to bear in mind that CIA immediately reported these allegations to the agency's inspector general and the Department of Justice." U.S. officials say there are a number of private contractors working for the CIA in Afghanistan and Iraq. They declined to say how many. CNN National Security Correspondent David Ensor contributed to this report. * Savedave.us -- Letter from David Passaro in prison: http://www.savedave.us/journal.html # # #