2006.12.08 - PEGC Update ========================== 1) HAMDAN v. RUMSFELD SCOTUSblog -- December 8, 2006 GOVERNMENT WANTS HAMDAN CASE DISMISSED By Lyle Denniston http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2006/12/government_want.html USDC D.D.C. -- HAMDAN v. RUMSFELD, No. 04-cv-1519 (JR) December 8, 2006 [GOVERNMENT'S] REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION http://www.pegc.us/archive/Hamdan_v_Rumsfeld/gov_reply_20061208.pdf 2) GUANTANAMO BAY Associated Press -- December 8, 2006 GUANTANAMO DETAINEES GOING TO NEW PRISON By Michael Melia http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061208/D8LSKE9O0.html Los Angeles Times -- December 8, 2006 ISLAM ADVISOR CITES 'CALMER' GUANTANAMO The Arab American, a layman, says prisoners' behavior has improved since he began helping alter military practices. By Carol J. Williams http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gitmoculture8dec08,0,5838900.story Inter Press Service -- December 5, 2006 NEAR-TOTAL ISOLATION SOUGHT FOR GUANTANAMO by William Fisher http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1205-04.htm 3) PRESIDENTIAL POWERS Legal Times -- December 4, 2006 PRESIDENT’S GAME? History refutes claims of unlimited presidential power over foreign affairs. By Louis Fisher http://www.pegc.us/archive/Articles/Fisher_LT_20061204.pdf December 8, 2006 THE REAL PROBLEM WITH HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD by Julian Ku http://www.opiniojuris.org/posts/1165509275.shtml * Julian Ku and John C. Yoo, HAMDAN v. RUMSFELD: THE FUNCTIONAL CASE FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS DEFERENCE TO THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, Hofstra U. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-32. http://ssrn.com/abstract=945454 4) OP-ED Balkinization -- December 8, 2006 A QUESTION FOR DECEMBER 7 Remarks at the Wolfson Center, New School U., New York City By Scott Horton http://balkin.blogspot.com/2006/12/question-for-december-7.html PEGC -- December 5, 2006 MY WORST MOMENT AS A LAWYER Remarks at Newburyport, MA Amnesty International Meeting By Sabin Willett http://www.pegc.us/archive/Articles/willett_AI_20061205.pdf Joseph Blocher, COMMENT: COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW TRIBUNALS: FLAWED ANSWERS TO THE WRONG QUESTION, 116 Yale L.J. 667 (2006). http://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/116-3/Blocher.pdf TomDispatch -- December 8, 2006 IMPUNITY AND IMMUNITY The Bush Administration Enters the Confessional By Karen Greenberg http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?emx=x&pid=146171 * * * PROJECT TO ENFORCE THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS (PEGC) http://www.pegc.us Charles B. Gittings Jr. Fort Bragg, California cbgittingsyahoo.com +1-707-964-2151